Author:
Pais Celso Alves,Parente Cristina
Abstract
Purpose
– The purpose of this article is to show how work-teams are represented and work in non-profit organizations. From a theoretical point of view, the concepts of macro-team and micro-team, as well as their dynamics rooted in the entrepreneurial world have been discussed.
Design/methodology/approach
– Seven socially enterprising organizations have been studied through semi-structured individual and collective interviews with managers, technicians with and without supervisory functions and workers. Data discussed here underwent an inductive analysis based on the procedures of grounded theory.
Findings
– Data analysis supported the outlining of the interviewees’ representations of their belonging to the macro-team and of the working of micro-teams. There seem to be no significant differences between the way teams work in these organizations and in profit-making organizations. However, in the organizations we have analyzed, autonomous planning of activities as a mechanism of work organization and assertiveness as a fundamental communication tool between members stand out.
Research limitations/implications
– This research did not include the systematic observation of work teams in the field. As such, reliability may be somehow compromised due to the use of the individual and group interview as the single data collection technique.
Practical implications
– The outline of representations that we have designed points to a set of dimensions that shows, with some reliability, how to build a sense of belonging to the macro-team among the workers of this type of organization. It also clarifies the difference between behaviors that foster effective and ineffective micro-teams. This allows action over the latter to potentiate the first and eventually eliminate the second.
Originality/value
– Considering the scarce research about team-work in non-profit organizations, this study offers a groundbreaking reflection. Further ahead, one may establish a set of differences and similarities between effective macro and micro-teams in different economic sectors. This way, this study may contribute to more encompassing organizational theories focused on the representations about and the functioning of macro and micro-teams.
Subject
Management of Technology and Innovation,Management Information Systems,Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management
Reference71 articles.
1. Aigneren, M.
(2002), “La técnica de recolección de información mediante los grupos focales”,
CEO Revista Electrónica
, No. 7, available at: http://revinut.udea.edu.co/index.php/ceo/article/viewFile/1611/1264 (accessed 14 April 2012).
2. Aubé, C.
and
Rousseau, V.
(2014), “Counterproductive behaviors: group phenomena with team-level consequences”,
Team Performance Management
, Vol. 20 Nos 5/6, pp. 202-220.
3. Austin, J.
,
Wei-Skillern, J.
and
Stevenson, H.
(2006), “Social and commercial entrepreneurship: same, different, or both?”,
Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice
, Vol. 30 No. 1, pp. 1-22.
4. Balkema, A.
and
Molleman, E.
(1999), “Barriers to the development of self-organizing teams”,
Journal of Managerial Psyshology
, Vol. 14 No. 2, pp. 134-149.
5. Boak, G.
(2014), “Team learning and service improvements in health care”,
Team Performance Management
, Vol. 20 Nos 5/6, pp. 242-261.
Cited by
8 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献