Quick and dirty or rapid and informative? Exploring a participatory method to facilitate implementation research and organizational change

Author:

von Thiele Schwarz UlricaORCID,Andersson Kin,Loeb CarinaORCID

Abstract

PurposeThe purpose is explore an approach to acquire, analyze and report data concerning an organizational change initiative that combines knowledge generation and knowledge use, and contrast that with a method where knowledge generation and use is separated. More specifically, the authors contrast a participatory group workshop with individual interviews analyzed with thematic analysis, focusing on information about the change process and its perceived practical relevance and usefulness.Design/methodology/approachParticipants were managers responsible for implementing a broad organizational change aiming to improve service quality (e.g. access and equity) and reduce costs in a mental health service organization in Sweden. Individual interviews were conducted at two points, six months apart (i1: n = 15; i2: n = 18). Between the interviews, a 3.5-h participatory group workshop was conducted, during which participants (n = 15) both generated and analyzed data through a structured process that mixed individual-, small- and whole-group activities.FindingsBoth approaches elicited substantive information about the content, purpose and process of change. While the content and purpose findings were similar across the two data sources, the interviews described how to lead a change process, whereas the workshop yielded concrete information about what to do. Benefits of interviews included personal insights about leading change while the workshop provided an opportunity for collective sense-making.Originality/valueWhen organizational stakeholders work through the change process through a participatory workshop, they may get on the same page, but require additional support to take action.

Publisher

Emerald

Subject

Health Policy,Business, Management and Accounting (miscellaneous)

Reference47 articles.

1. Forms of participation: the development and application of a conceptual model of participation in work environment interventions;Economic and Industrial Democracy,2020

2. The need for dual openness to change: a longitudinal study evaluating the impact of employees' openness to organizational change content and process on intervention outcomes;The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science,2017

3. Pragmatic dissemination and implementation research models, methods and measures and their relevance for nursing research;Nursing Outlook,2018

4. An introduction to implementation science for the non-specialist;BMC Psychology,2015

5. When complexity science meets implementation science: a theoretical and empirical analysis of systems change;BMC Medicine,2018

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Guest editorial;Journal of Health Organization and Management;2021-10-13

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3