Impact of a dementia-specific program of equine-assisted activities: providers’ perspectives

Author:

Fields BethORCID,Wood Wendy,Lassell Rebecca

Abstract

Purpose Establishing acceptability of complex interventions to stakeholders is vital in early scientific development. The purpose of this paper is to ascertain the acceptability of a program of equine-assisted activities (EAAP) for people with dementia by elucidating programmatic practices needed to enhance their safety and quality of life (QoL) from the perspectives of service providers. Design/methodology/approach Semi-structured interviews with five providers were analyzed using a basic qualitative approach. Findings Providers perceived the EAAP as acceptable and revealed potential mechanisms of change supporting well-being, including aspects related to the physical and social environment and person with dementia. Linkages identified among the EAAP and its physical and social context support its complexity. Providers explicated program practices that promoted safety and QoL, such as implementing staff trainings and tailoring activities to each person’s preferences and needs. These practices aligned with best dementia care approaches, underscoring that the EAAP is a promising complex intervention that merits further scientific development. Originality/value This work is novel and adds to the literature by illuminating the role of a community-based, animal-assisted program for enhancing the QoL of older adults with dementia residing in institutional care facilities.

Publisher

Emerald

Subject

Care Planning,Community and Home Care,Gerontology

Reference22 articles.

1. Craig, P., Dieppe, P., Macintyre, S., Michie, S., Nazareth, I. and Petticrew, M. (2006), “Developing and evaluating complex interventions: new guidance”, available at: https://mrc.ukri.org/documents/pdf/complex-interventions-guidance/ (accessed November 15, 2018).

2. Developing and evaluating complex interventions: The new medical research council guidance;International Journal of Nursing Studies,2007

3. Developing and evaluating complex interventions: the new medical research council guidance;BMJ,2008

4. Creswell, J.W. (2013), Qualitative Inquiry & Research Design: Choosing among Five Approaches, 3rd ed., SAGE, Thousand Oaks, CA, pp. 69-110.

5. Equine-assisted intervention for people with dementia;Anthrozoos,2014

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3