Human aspects of interdisciplinary research
Author:
E. Khilji Shaista
Abstract
Purpose
– Based upon the argument that the primary characteristic of successful interdisciplinary research lies in human behavior and action (Brun et al., 2007 as cited in Buller, 2008), the purpose of this paper is to offer a view on human aspects of interdisciplinary research.
Findings
– The paper presents interdisciplinary research as an overlapping process of collective human interactions, consisting of group composition, conceptualization, integration and contribution. Conceptualization and integration processes are particularly important for knowledge exchange and creation as individuals learn to translate, articulate, relate and relocate their original disciplinary positions (Buller, 2008). Further, the paper argues that interdisciplinarity can be enhanced through appropriate group mechanisms and practices; and successful interdisciplinary research also translates into individual (and group) learning and capability development, in addition to knowledge creation.
Research limitations/implications
– Interdisciplinary research is important for IB scholars to stay relevant in today's complex environment (Cheng et al., 2009). Since the South Asian region represents extreme contrast and paradoxes, interdisciplinary research could prove particularly valuable in exploring contradictions there (Khilji, 2012).
Originality/value
– The value of this perspective is in describing interdisciplinary research as a boundary-spanning experience for researchers in that it facilitates creation of new insights and allows them to transcend their original discipline. However, interdisciplinarity itself is not automatic, but must be collectively managed through appropriate group mechanisms and practices (Buller, 2008; Haythornthwaite, 2006).
Reference34 articles.
1. Aboelela, S.W.
,
Larson, E.
,
Bakken, S.
,
Carrasquillo, O.
,
Formicola, A.
,
Glied, S.A.
,
Haas, J.
and
Gebbie, K.M.
(2006), “Defining interdisciplinary research: conclusions from a critical review of the literature”, Health Services Research, Vol. 42 No. 1, pp. 329-346. 2. Adams, J.D.
and
Clemmons, J.R.
(2011), “The role of search in university productivity: inside, outside, and interdisciplinary dimensions”, Industrial and Corporate Change, Vol. 20 No. 1, pp. 215-251. 3. Adams, S.M.
,
Carter, N.C.
,
Hadlock, C.R.
,
Haughton, D.M.
and
Sirbu, G.
(2008), “Proactive encouragement of interdisciplinary research teams in a business school environment: strategy and results”, Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management, Vol. 30 No. 2, pp. 153-164. 4. Alvesson, M.
and
Deetz, S.
(2000), Doing Critical Management Research, SAGE Publications, London. 5. Bruhn, J.G.
(1995), “Beyond discipline creating a culture for interdisciplinary research”, Integrative Physiological and Behavioral Sciences, Vol. 30 No. 4, pp. 331-341.
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|