The fine line between success and failure: an analysis of open innovation projects

Author:

Greco MarcoORCID,Strazzullo SerenaORCID,Cricelli LivioORCID,Grimaldi MicheleORCID,Mignacca BenitoORCID

Abstract

PurposeDespite the multiple calls for research on the dark side of open innovation, very few studies have approached the topic so far. This study aims to analyse successful and unsuccessful open innovation projects.Design/methodology/approachThis study uses thematic analysis to describe the factors determining their (un)success. The researchers interviewed 27 managers and owners in the manufacturing sector. Then, the respondents were asked to discuss one successful and one unsuccessful open innovation project to explore the differences in triggers and setbacks, focusing on the causes that determined the failures.FindingsFindings show that many interviewees are reluctant to identify failure cases, which somewhat explains the paucity of studies on the topic, and others do so when the failure is recognised by a third party (such as a public institution not granting funds to the project). This study discussed how this phenomenon is linked with the paradoxical relation between innovation success and failure. It is also found that triggers and setbacks determining the project's (un)success are markedly differently based on the technological intensity of the firm. Implications for scholars and practitioners are also drawn.Originality/valueThis study provides a balanced view between open innovation successes and failures to offer informative recommendations to practitioners. Furthermore, it contributes to filling the scarcity of studies related to risks and failures of open innovation projects. This gap has been addressed by studying the factors that determine the success and unsuccess of an open innovation project.

Publisher

Emerald

Subject

Management of Technology and Innovation

Reference85 articles.

1. Yin, R. K. (2009). Case study research: design and methods (4th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage;The Canadian Journal of Action Research,2013

2. Exploring how social interactions influence regulators and innovators: the case of regulatory sandboxes;Technological Forecasting and Social Change,2020

3. The impact of open-border organization culture and employees' knowledge, attitudes, and rewards with regards to open innovation: an empirical study;Journal of Knowledge Management,2020

4. Opening the black box of ‘not invented here’: attitudes, decision biases, and behavioral consequences;Academy of Management Perspectives,2015

5. Service innovation in Indian knowledge-intensive business services: the Wipro case;International Journal of Learning and Intellectual Capital,2013

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3