Non-financial information assurance: a review of the literature and directions for future research

Author:

Farooq Muhammad Bilal,Azantouti Asem Saad Ali,Zaman Rashid

Abstract

Purpose This study aims to review the literature on non-financial information (NFI) assurance including external assurance of sustainability reports (SRA) and integrated reports (IRA). The objectives are as follows: provide an overview of academic research; understand the nature of NFI assurance engagements by organising the literature around the five key elements of an assurance engagement; develop a framework for understanding NFI assurance; and provide directions for future research. Design/methodology/approach The study undertakes a structured literature review of 179 articles published from 1999 to 2023. Findings The review identified 324 researchers located in 35 different countries who published 179 articles on SRA and IRA. The researchers, their locations, journals, methods, theories and themes are examined. The literature is structured around the definition of an assurance engagement including a tripartite arrangement, subject matter, a suitable criterion, sufficient appropriate evidence and a written assurance report. A framework for understanding NFI assurance is offered. Avenues for future research, structured around the five elements of an assurance engagement, are presented. Practical implications Researchers will benefit from an overview of the literature and guidance on areas for future research. Lecturers can use the findings to develop content for their auditing courses. Reporting managers will benefit from a better understanding of this new form of assurance. Regulators can use this study’s insights to better inform the development of laws and corporate governance codes mandating NFI assurance. Standard setters can use these findings to guide the emergence of the new assurance standards. Assurance practitioners may use this research to inform practice. Social implications The findings may prove useful in addressing capture, which deters NFI assurance from enhancing disclosure credibility and fulfilling its transparency and accountability role. This is to the detriment of the wider society. Originality/value The consolidation of the literature around the five key elements of an assurance engagement is unique. The framework devised offers useful insights into the dynamics of assurance generally and NFI assurance more specifically. The study is timely given the new European Union regulations on NFI reporting and assurance and the work of the International Audit and Assurance Standards Board in developing a specialist NFI assurance standard.

Publisher

Emerald

Subject

General Business, Management and Accounting,Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment,Accounting

Reference128 articles.

1. AccountAbility (2008), AA1000 AccountAbility Principles Standard 2008, available at: www.accountability.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/10/AA1000APS_english.pdf

2. Mandatory corporate social responsibility assurance practices: the case of King III in South Africa;Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal,2015

3. Accountability, completeness, credibility and the audit expectations gap;Journal of Corporate Citizenship,2004

4. Integrated reports, external assurance and financial performance: an empirical analysis on North American firms;Sustainability Accounting, Management and Policy Journal,2019

5. Attributes of corporate boards and assurance of corporate social responsibility reporting: evidence from the UK;Corporate Governance: The International Journal of Business in Society,2022

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3