Author:
du Plooy Daniel Rupert,Lyons Anthony,Kashima Emiko S.
Abstract
Purpose
This paper aims to examine the relationship between migrants’ psychological well-being and the extent to which they keep in touch with people in their country of origin.
Design/methodology/approach
An online survey completed by 1,328 Australian migrants from 4 cultural groups (Anglo, Southern Asian, Confucian Asian and other European) assessed 2 facets of well-being, namely, flourishing and psychological distress and the use of 3 modes of online communication, namely, social media, messaging services and phone/video services.
Findings
Overall, keeping in touch with family and friends in their country of origin was associated with more flourishing and less distress amongst migrants. Nonetheless, the preferred modes of communication and how those usages relate with well-being varied considerably across cultural groups. In the Anglo group, communicating through messaging and phone/video services was associated with lower distress and communicating in all modes was associated with higher flourishing. Furthermore, the latter link was accounted for by having a meaningful conversation.
Originality/value
These findings suggest that the psychological well-being of migrant populations may be supported by an understanding of the distinct roles played by specific communication modes that are used to stay in touch with family and friends back home.
Subject
Law,Sociology and Political Science,Health (social science)
Reference42 articles.
1. Australian Bureau of Statistics (2015), “National migrant statistics unit (NMSU)”, available at: https://www.abs.gov.au/AUSSTATS/abs@.nsf/Lookup/3415.0Main+Features12012?OpenDocument (accessed 31 August 2015).
2. Online communication, social media and adolescent wellbeing: a systematic narrative review;Children and Youth Services Review,2014
3. Migration and depression;Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica,2003
4. Migration, distress and cultural identity;British Medical Bulletin,2004
5. Where (who) are collectives in collectivism? Toward conceptual clarification of individualism and collectivism;Psychological Review,2007