Author:
Cormier Denis,Gordon Irene M.
Abstract
The purpose of this study is to examine three electric utilities, two publicly owned and one privately owned. The basis of this examination is legitimacy theory employing a small sample case‐type approach. In particular we are interested in social and environmental disclosures found in annual reports and how these disclosures differentiate between publicly owned and privately owned enterprises. In our examination we use some traditional efficiency measures but we also employ effectiveness measures relying on the proprietary costs and information costs views in our analysis. Our major findings are that ownership status and size, which are likely to affect legitimacy, influence the amount of social and environmental disclosure. Finally, while environmental disclosures seem to be related to information costs and benefits, this relationship does not seem to hold for social disclosures.
Subject
Economics, Econometrics and Finance (miscellaneous),Accounting
Reference84 articles.
1. Atiase, R. (1985), “Predisclosure information, firm capitalization, and security price behavior around earnings announcements”, Journal of Accounting Research, Vol. 23 No. 1, pp. 21‐36.
2. Atkinson, S.E. and Halvorsen, R. (1986), “The relative efficiency of public and private firms in a regulated environment: the case of US electric utilities”, Journal of Public Economics, Vol.29 No. 3, pp. 281‐94.
3. Barth, M.E., McNichols, M.F. and Wilson, G.P. (1995), “Factors influencing firms’ disclosures about environmental liabilities” Working Paper, Stanford University, Stanford, CA.
4. BC Hydro (1985 through 1996), Annual Reports, BC Hydro International, Vancouver.
5. Belkaoui, A. (1976), “The impact of the disclosures of the environmental effects of organizational behavior on the market”, Financial Management, Vol. 2 No. 1, pp. 26‐31.
Cited by
394 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献