Abstract
This paper formalises the choice a firm has to face when entering a foreign market via FDI as between setting up an entirely new plant (greenfield investment) or acquiring an existing indigenous firm. We assume the existence of an asymmetric duopoly in the host country, and these duopolists face the entry of a technologically advanced foreign firm in the market. The analysis shows how different constellations of entry costs and the post‐entry competition affect the foreign firm’s entry mode choice. Simulation results show that the foreign entrant will in most cases be best off by acquiring an existing indigenous high‐technology firm, thus, forming a duopoly with an indigenous low‐technology firm. We also discuss briefly the strategic dimension to the model, where the foreign firm has the possibility of crowding out the indigenous incumbents through lowering the price.
Subject
General Economics, Econometrics and Finance
Reference27 articles.
1. Anderson, T. and Svensson, R. (1994), “Entry modes for direct investment determined by the composition of firm‐specific skills”, Scandinavian Journal of Economics, Vol. 96, pp. 551‐60.
2. Auerbach, A.J. and Hassett, K. (1993), “Taxation and foreign direct investment in the United States: a reconsideration of the evidence”, in Giovannini, A., Hubbard, R.G. and Slemrod, J. (Eds), Studies in International Taxation, Chicago University Press, Chicago, IL, pp. 119‐44.
3. Buckley, P.J. and Casson, M. (1981), “The optimal timing of a foreign direct investment”, Economic Journal, Vol. 91, pp. 75‐87.
4. Buckley, P.J. and Casson, M. (1996), “An economic model of international joint ventures”, Journal of International Business Studies, Vol. 27, pp. 849‐76.
5. Buckley, P.J. and Casson, M. (1998), “Analysing foreign market entry strategies: extending the internalisation approach”, Journal of International Business Studies, Vol. 29, pp. 539‐62.
Cited by
61 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献