Innovation in micro enterprises: reality or fiction?

Author:

Faherty Ultan,Stephens Simon

Abstract

Purpose – Although there is significant literature on innovation activities in large and medium-sized enterprises, studies that report on innovation practices in micro enterprises are lacking. The purpose of this paper is to explore three issues: understanding of the term “innovation”, innovation practice(s) and how innovation can be effectively measured. Design/methodology/approach – The 12 case studies presented in this paper involve micro enterprises based in Ireland. Data collected during depth interviews provide insights into understanding, practices, motivations, behaviours and attitudes relating to innovation. Findings – Although awareness of innovation theories, processes and procedures is found to be low, all of the micro enterprises studied engage in a range of innovation activities across products, processes, people and marketing. Innovation is important to the development of the enterprises; however, innovation is not a managed or systematic process, and this is often due to lack of resources. Practical implications – This paper presents six recommendations which are of use to academics, micro enterprises and government support agencies. These recommendations include making changes to the service provided by support agencies, simplifying innovation, developing an innovation brokering facility, and improving the design/delivery of innovation programmes. Originality/value – The paper enriches understanding of the experience of participants through the use of narrative structuring, and augments knowledge on the innovation practices of micro enterprises.

Publisher

Emerald

Subject

Strategy and Management,Business, Management and Accounting (miscellaneous)

Reference46 articles.

1. Amabile, T. , Hadley, C. and Kramer, S. (2002), “Creativity under the gun”, Harvard Business Review on The Innovative Enterprise , pp. 1-26.

2. Ambler, T. , Kokkinaki, F. , Puntoni, S. and Riley, D. (2001), “Assessing market performance: the current state of metrics”, Working Paper No. 1-903, London Business School, London, pp. 1-14.

3. Andrew, J. and Sirkin, H. (2003), “Innovating for cash”, Harvard Business Review, September, pp. 1-9.

4. Anthony, S. , Johnson, M. , Sinfield, J. and Altman, E. (2008), Innovation Metrics , Harvard Business Press, Boston, MA, pp. 1-15.

5. Baregheh, A. , Rowley, J. , Sambrook, S. and Davies, D. (2012), “Innovation in food sector SMEs”, Journal of Small Business and Enterprise Development , Vol. 19 No. 2, pp. 300-321.

Cited by 45 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3