Curating research data: the potential roles of libraries and information professionals

Author:

Jørn Nielsen Hans,Hjørland Birger

Abstract

Purpose – A key issue in the literature about research libraries concerns their potential role in managing research data. The aim of this paper is to study the arguments for and against associating this task with libraries and the impact such an association would have on information professionals, and consider the competitors to libraries in this field. Design/methodology/approach – This paper considers the nature of data and discusses data typologies, the kinds of data contained within databases and the implications of criticisms of the data-information-knowledge (DIK) hierarchy. It outlines the many competing agencies in the data curation field and describes their relationships to different kinds of data. Findings – Many data are organically connected to the activities of large, domain-specific organizations; as such, it might be difficult for research libraries to assume a leadership role in curating data. It seems more likely that the qualifications of information professionals will come to be needed in such organizations and that the functions of research libraries will shift toward giving greater prevalence to their role as specialists in scholarly communication. In some cases, however, research libraries may be the best place to select, keep, organize and use research data. To prepare for this task, research libraries should be actively involved in domain-specific analytic studies of their respective domains. Originality/value – This paper offers a theoretical analysis and clarification of the problems of data curating from the perspective of research libraries.

Publisher

Emerald

Subject

Library and Information Sciences,Information Systems

Reference39 articles.

1. Ackoff, R.L. (1989), “From data to wisdom”, Journal of Applied Systems Analysis, Vol. 16 No. 1, pp. 3-9.

2. Barfort, S. (2010), “Samfundsvidenskabelige Primærdata” (Primary Data of Social Sciences), KUBIS Videncenter for Videnskabelig Kommunikation, Det Kongelige Bibliotek/Københavns Universitets Biblioteks og Informationsservice, available at: http://hprints.org/docs/00/45/10/00/PDF/KUBIS-rapport_om_samfundsvidenskabelige_primaerdata_2009_Barfort_et_al.pdf (accessed 8 May 2012).

3. Battalio, J.T. (1998), The Rhetoric of Science in the Evolution of American Ornithological Discourse, Ablex, Stamford, CT.

4. Blue Ribbon Task Force on Sustainable Economics for a Digital Planet (2013), Sustainable Economics for a Digital Planet. Ensuring Long-Term Access to Digital Information, available at: http://brtf.sdsc.edu/biblio/BRTF_Final_Report.pdf (accessed 9 January 2013).

5. Bogen, J. (2009) in Zalta, E.N. (Ed.), “Theory and observation in science”, The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, Winter ed., available at: http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/science-theory-observation/ (accessed 9 January 2013).

Cited by 48 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3