Abstract
PurposeThis study investigates the multifaceted barriers and facilitators affecting research data sharing across the research data lifecycle. It aims to broaden the understanding of data sharing beyond the publication phase, emphasizing the continuous nature of data sharing from generation to reuse.Design/methodology/approachEmploying a mixed-methods approach, the study integrates the Theory of Planned Behavior, the Technology Acceptance Model, and the Institutional Theory to hypothesize the influence of various factors on data sharing behaviors across the lifecycle. A questionnaire survey and structural equation modeling are utilized to empirically test these hypotheses.FindingsThis study identifies critical factors influencing data sharing at different lifecycle stages, including perceived behavioral control, perceived effort, journal and funding agency pressures, subjective norms, perceived risks, resource availability, and perceived benefits. The findings highlight the complex interplay of these factors and their varying impacts at different stages of data sharing.Research limitations/implicationsThis study illuminates the dynamics of research data sharing, offering insights while recognizing its scope might not capture all disciplinary and cultural nuances. It highlights pathways for stakeholders to bolster data sharing, suggesting a collaborative push towards open science, reflecting on how strategic interventions can bridge existing gaps in practice.Practical implicationsThis study offers actionable recommendations for policymakers, journals, and institutions to foster a more conducive environment for data sharing, emphasizing the need for support mechanisms at various lifecycle stages.Originality/valueThis study contributes to the literature by offering a comprehensive model of the research data lifecycle, providing empirical evidence on the factors influencing data sharing across this continuum.
Reference70 articles.
1. A comparison of partial least square structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM) and covariance based structural equation modeling (CB-SEM) for confirmatory factor analysis;International Journal of Engineering Science and Innovative Technology,2013
2. The theory of planned behavior;Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes,1991
3. Perceived behavioral control, self-efficacy, locus of control, and the theory of planned behavior;Journal of Applied Social Psychology,2002
4. Ajzen, I. and Fishbein, M. (2018), “The influence of attitudes on behavior”, in The Handbook of Attitudes, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, pp. 197-255.