Modelling advances in gatekeeping theory for academic libraries

Author:

Ojennus Paul

Abstract

Purpose The purpose of this paper is to evaluate the appropriateness of gatekeeping theory, particularly its recent elaboration in journalism and communication studies for the investigation of information flows in academic libraries. Design/methodology/approach This paper uses the methods of conceptual analysis and thought experiment. Findings This paper finds that current elaborations of gatekeeping theory are useful for modeling library information flows, particularly identifying and evaluating influences on those flows. It is able to reframe intransigent issues around library neutrality and open access so that more nuanced approaches can be constructed. Originality/value Gatekeeping theory as elaborated by Shoemaker and Vos for journalism and communication studies, while occasionally referenced the library and information science (LIS) literature, has not been previously evaluated as a framework for library information flows. This is the first paper to assess the potential of aspects of the theory such as levels of analysis and multiplicity of channels to reframe issues in LIS.

Publisher

Emerald

Subject

Library and Information Sciences,Information Systems

Reference54 articles.

1. Inner-city gatekeepers: an exploratory survey of their information use environment;Journal of the American Society for Information Science,1999

2. Gatekeepers, virtual communities and the gated: multidimensional tensions in cyberspace;International Journal of Communications Law and Policy,2006

3. Toward a theory of network gatekeeping: a framework for exploring information control;Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology,2008

4. Refining the ‘gatekeeper’ concept: a UN radio case study;Journalism Quarterly,1969

Cited by 4 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Open Access;Handbook of Research on the Global View of Open Access and Scholarly Communications;2022-04-29

2. Librarians as gate-openers in open access publishing: A case study in the United Arab Emirates;The Journal of Academic Librarianship;2021-09

3. Cognitive Authority as an Instance of Informational and Expert Power;Libri;2021-08-19

4. Manifestations of expert power in gatekeeping: a conceptual study;Journal of Documentation;2020-04-11

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3