Author:
Borekci Dilek,Rofcanin Yasin,Sahin Meral
Abstract
Purpose
– The central goal of this research is to understand the effects of organizational culture and organizational resilience over the riskiness versus non-riskiness categorization of subcontractors. The paper aims to discuss these issues.
Design/methodology/approach
– This study utilizes multiple sources of data collected in two different time setting. At time one, data were collected from the subcontractors (n=50) of a leading services providing company in Turkey. In order to validate these findings, second wave of data collection was followed one year later. This time, the data were collected from the subcontractors (n=59) of another services providing company in Turkey. Cluster approach was applied.
Findings
– Results from the cluster analyses revealed interesting insights. Subcontractors that were characterized by high-performance orientation, high uncertainty avoidance and high future orientation were categorized as non-risky. Therefore, the hypotheses found support. Furthermore, in terms of the organizational resilience dimensions, subcontractors having high structural reliance, organizational capability and processual continuity were also categorized as non-risky. The validation study carried out with different subcontractors also revealed the same patterns of findings.
Research limitations/implications
– This study revealed that organizational culture and organizational resilience carry critical implications during the subcontractor selection process. Focal companies that seek to expand their work with subcontractors should seek cultural fit and resilience.
Originality/value
– This study is the first study to examine the effects of organizational culture and organizational resilience over subcontractor riskiness in the same framework. Furthermore, data were collected from different sources, in two different times and using different approaches.
Subject
Business, Management and Accounting (miscellaneous),Business and International Management
Reference91 articles.
1. Abraham, K.G.
(1990), “Restructuring the employment relationship: the growth of market-mediated work arrangements”, in
Abraham, K.G.
and
McKersie, R.B.
(Eds), New Developments in the Labor Market: Toward a New Institutional Paradigm, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
2. Ames, C.
and
Archer, J.
(1988), “Achievement goals in the classroom: students' learning strategies and motivation processes”, Journal of Educational Psychology, Vol. 80, pp. 260-267.
3. Amesse, F.
,
Dragoste, L.
,
Nollet, J.
and
Ponce, S.
(2001), “Issues on partnering: evidences from subcontracting in aeronautics”, Technovation, Vol. 21, pp. 559-569.
4. Balu, R.
(2001), “How to bounce back from setbacks”, Fast Company, Vol. 45, pp. 148-156.
5. Bandura, A.
(1982), “Self-efficacy mechanism in human agency”, American Psychologist, Vol. 37 No. 2, pp. 122-147.
Cited by
25 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献