Coaching leaders in middle and executive management: goals, performance, buy‐in

Author:

Bowles Stephen,Cunningham Christopher J.L.,De La Rosa Gabriel M.,Picano James

Abstract

PurposeThis article aims to test the effectiveness of coaching for middle and executive level managers within a large recruiting organization.Design/methodology/approachParticipants set goals to achieve during a 12‐month coaching programme. The sample consisted of middle managers (n=30) and executive managers (n=29) involved in US Army recruiting. Outcomes included measures of coached participants' achievement of quota and personal goals, and assessment on nine leader competencies and buy‐in over the one‐year coaching period.FindingsCoached managers outperformed un‐coached, but experienced/incumbent counterparts. The strongest impact of coaching on performance was for middle managers and their subordinates (as opposed to executive managers). Both groups of participants demonstrated growth on some dimensions of recruiter‐leader competencies and achievement of self‐set goals.Research limitations/implicationsA small and nontraditional sample of military recruiters was used. Future researchers can build on the approach outlined here to more concretely evaluate the impact of their coaching efforts in other populations.Practical implicationsCoaching all recruiter managers could translate into a return on investment of several thousand additional recruits. In addition, the achievement of personally relevant goals with the help of coaching, the development of leader competencies indicates real benefit associated with this form of goal‐based coaching.Originality/valueWe offer one of the first empirical evaluations of the effectiveness of a goal‐based leader coaching intervention. Practitioners and researchers can benefit from this approach by using it to improve coaching effectiveness and demonstrate value to the clients they serve.

Publisher

Emerald

Subject

Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management,Business, Management and Accounting (miscellaneous)

Reference36 articles.

1. Bandura, A. (1997), Self‐Efficacy: The Exercise of Control, Freeman, New York, NY.

2. Bradfield, A. and Wells, G.L. (2005), “Not the same old hindsight bias: outcome information distorts a broad range of retrospective judgments”, Memory & Cognition, Vol. 33 No. 1, pp. 120‐30.

3. Bowles, S. and Picano, J.J. (2007), “Dimensions of coaching related to productivity and quality of life”, Consulting Psychology Journal: Practice and Research (forthcoming).

4. Dembkowski, S. and Eldridge, F. (2003), “Beyond GROW: a new coaching model”, The International Journal of Mentoring and Coaching, Vol. 1 No. 1, p. 21, available at: www.emccouncil.org/uk/journal.htm (accessed October 21, 2005).

5. Department of the Army (1994), Department of the Army Pamplet 10‐1: Organization of the United States Army, Available at: www.army.mil/usapa/epubs/10_Series_ Collection_1.html (accessed November 21, 2006).

Cited by 51 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3