Looking at leaders: a conjoint analysis
Author:
Soutar Geoffrey N.,Ridley Shaun
Abstract
PurposeConjoint analysis is a useful research technique, but has not been used in the leadership area. This study aims to examine its relevance in exploring the trade‐offs followers make about leaders and the value of the leadership attributes examined.Design/methodology/approachEight leader attributes were obtained from three focus groups. Past research and a sample of followers indicated their preferences for a number of leader profiles developed from the attributes, as well as assessing their present leaders on the same attributes. This enabled an estimation of the trade‐offs followers made in assessing leaders and the computation of a value “score” for their leader.FindingsThe study finds that participants traded off leader attributes sensibly, providing useful information about the attributes' value. Inspiration, trust and communication were the most valued leader attributes. However, most leaders were not viewed positively.Research limitations/implicationsRespondents were participants in development programmes, which may have impacted on the responses, but the results suggested the approach had merit. Research with more general samples of followers and a wider range of leadership topics is needed.Practical implicationsFuture development programmes should focus on the “valuable” attributes and organisations also need to consider such attributes when selecting and evaluating leaders.Originality/valueThis paper uses a conjoint approach that has not been used in the leadership area. The results provide additional insights into the way followers view leaders and enabled a leader “score” to be computed, giving insights into the state of leadership within the group from which responses were obtained.
Subject
Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management,Business, Management and Accounting (miscellaneous)
Reference35 articles.
1. Aaker, D.A., Kumar, V. and Day, G.S. (1995), Marketing Research, Wiley, New York, NY. 2. Baker, W.M. and Mcgregor, C.C. (2000), “Empirically assessing the importance of characteristics of accounting students”, Journal of Education for Business, Vol. 75 No. 3, pp. 149‐57. 3. Bass, B.M. (1990), Bass and Stogdill's Handbook of Leadership, The Free Press, New York, NY. 4. Bass, B.M. and Avolio, B.J. (1990), Transformational Leadership Development: Manual for the Multifactor Leadership Questionnaire, Consulting Psychologists Press, Palo Alto, CA. 5. Bass, B.M., Jung, D.I., Avolio, B.J. and Berson, Y. (2003), “Predicting unit performance by assessing transformational and transactional leadership”, Journal of Applied Psychology, Vol. 88 No. 2, pp. 207‐18.
Cited by
6 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|