Exploring undergraduate student experiences with information literacy

Author:

Zoellner Kate

Abstract

Purpose The purpose of this paper is to examine the differences between first-year and senior undergraduate students’ information literacy behaviors and experiences as measured by the National Survey of Student Engagement Experiences with Information Literacy module. Design/methodology/approach Publically available data resulting from the 2014 and 2015 module was analyzed. Descriptive statistics were used to compare group percentages and inferential statistics to discriminate the statistical significance of enrollment status. Findings Statistically significant differences between first-year and senior students were identified for the majority of survey items in both 2014 and 2015. Survey items with the highest effect sizes showed senior students were more likely to: complete an assignment that used the library’s electronic collections, be required to employ practices of a specific major of field, and indicate their institution contributed to their effective use of information. The least frequently exhibited behaviors for both groups were those that require higher-order thinking. Research limitations/implications Limitations of the study include the granularity of publicly available data and the applicability of the results to specific institutions and beyond the USA. Practical implications This study points to areas for further investigation at the national level and offers an approach for colleges and universities to take with their local data. Originality/value The originality of this paper lies in the analysis of a recently launched information literacy survey.

Publisher

Emerald

Subject

Library and Information Sciences

Reference16 articles.

1. Association of American Colleges and Universities (AACU) (2007), “College learning for the new global century”, available at: www.aacu.org/sites/default/files/files/LEAP/GlobalCentury_final.pdf (accessed July 18, 2016).

2. Association of College and Research Libraries (2000), “Information literacy competency standards for higher education”, available at: www.ala.org/acrl/sites/ala.org.acrl/files/content/standards/standards.pdf (accessed July 18, 2016).

3. Association of College and Research Libraries (ACRL) (2010), “The value of academic libraries: a comprehensive research review and report”, M. Oakleaf Researcher, available at: www.acrl.ala.org/value (accessed July 18, 2016).

4. Association of College and Research Libraries (2016), “Framework for information literacy for higher education”, available at: www.ala.org/acrl/sites/ala.org.acrl/files/content/issues/infolit/Framework_ILHE.pdf (accessed July 18, 2016).

5. Feasible, scalable, and measurable: information literacy assessment and the national survey of student engagement,2012

Cited by 3 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Demographic analysis of information literacy self-efficacy among library and information science students in Indonesia;Library & Information Science Research;2024-01

2. Visualization analysis of university information literacy education research data;Third International Conference on Computer Science and Communication Technology (ICCSCT 2022);2022-12-29

3. Information literacy: a desideratum of the 21st century;Online Information Review;2021-08-24

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3