A new process for creating points systems for prioritising patients for elective health services

Author:

Hansen Paul,Hendry Alison,Naden Ray,Ombler Franz,Stewart Ralph

Abstract

PurposeThis paper aims to describe a new process for creating points systems – i.e. decision criteria and their point values – for prioritising patients for access to elective health services.Design/methodology/approachThe process was developed in New Zealand from a project the authors were closely involved in, beginning in 2004, to create new points systems, initially for coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery and then successively for other elective services. The objective was to overcome the limitations of earlier methodologies for creating points systems.FindingsThe process, supported by internet‐based software, consists of seven steps performed by a working group of clinical leaders for the elective service concerned, in consultation with patient groups and other clinicians. The authors' experience reveals it is acceptable to clinicians and their professional organisations as well as to patient groups.Originality/valueThe process creates points systems that are valid and reproducible and based on a consensus of clinical judgements. The process is explained in a step‐by‐step manner so that it is possible for readers to apply it themselves to create points systems for their own patient‐prioritisation applications.

Publisher

Emerald

Subject

Health Policy

Reference25 articles.

1. Belton, V. and Stewart, T.J. (2002), Multiple Criteria Decision Analysis: An Integrated Approach, Kluwer, Boston, MA.

2. Day, S. (2006), “Valid, transparent and fair decision‐making processes for access to elective health care. Innovation Award 2006”, available at: www.hiirc.org.nz/page/17863/valid‐transparent‐and‐fair‐decision‐making/?tag=healthinnovations&tab=27&contentType =507 (accessed 11 November 2011).

3. De Coster, C. and Noseworthy, T. (2009), “WCWL priority referral scores”, in Nason, E, and Roberts, G. (Eds), Taming of the Queue VI: Improving Patient Flow, 6th National Invitational Conference on Wait Time Measurement, Monitoring and Management, Ottawa, Canada, CPRN Research Report, June 2009, available at: www.cprn.org/documents/51431_EN.pdf (accessed 11 November 2011).

4. Dennett, E.R., Kipping, R.R., Parry, B.R. and Windsor, J. (1998), “Priority access for elective cholecystectomy: a comparison of three scoring methods”, New Zealand Medical Journal, Vol. 111, pp. 231‐3.

5. Drummond, M.F., Sculpher, M.J., Torrance, G.W., O'Brien, B.J. and Stoddart, G.L. (2005), Methods for the Economic Evaluation of Health Care Programmes, Oxford University Press, Oxford.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3