Author:
Sligo F.X.,Massey Claire,Lewis Kate
Abstract
PurposeThis research aimed to obtain insights into how farmers on small and medium‐sized farms perceived the benefits of the information they receive from their interpersonal networks and other sources.Design/methodology/approachFarmers' information environments were explored using socio‐spatial knowledge networks, diaries and in‐depth interviews (to draw out participants' interpretations of significance). This enabled the perceived benefits of information to be interpreted within the context of participants' interpersonal networks.FindingsBoth on and off‐farm information sources were important. The benefit most valued was when farmers perceived they were enabled to challenge or reframe their thinking about professional and business issues.Practical implicationsThe study of information benefits is still relatively new, but a fuller appreciation of how learners perceive benefits from incoming information may provide insights into how to present information in ways that foster useful outcomes. Possible gaps and limitations in farmers' information supply may also follow the identification of how benefits are perceived.Originality/valueFarmers' access to information was mainly shaped by the particularities of the contexts within which they lived and worked. Yet they proactively kept up significant interpersonal connections even at a distance (by means such as by phone contact with former neighbours who now lived elsewhere). Farmers' sources of information were closely aligned to the information they already possessed, so that “what they know” was intimately configured within “who they are” as members of a family, a community, and as farmers.
Subject
Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management,Development,Social Psychology
Reference26 articles.
1. Bogenrieder, I. and Nooteboom, B. (2004), “Learning groups: what types are there? A theoretical analysis and an empirical study in a consultancy firm”, Organization Studies, Vol. 25 No. 2, pp. 287‐313.
2. Charmaz, K. (2000), “Grounded theory: objectivist and constructivist methods”, in Denzin, N.K. and Lincoln, Y.S. (Eds), Handbook of Qualitative Research, 2nd ed., Sage Publications, London.
3. Cravey, A.J., Washburn, S.A., Gesler, W.M., Arcury, T.A. and Skelly, A.H. (2001), “Developing socio‐spatial knowledge networks: A qualitative methodology for chronic disease prevention”, Social Science & Medicine, Vol. 52, pp. 1763‐75.
4. Cross, R. (2000), “More than an answer: how seeking information through people facilitates knowledge creation and use”, paper presented at the Academy of Management Conference, Toronto.
5. Cross, R., Borgatti, S.P. and Parker, A. (2001), “Beyond answers: dimensions of the advice network”, Social Networks, Vol. 23 No. 3, pp. 215‐35.
Cited by
16 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献