Investigating the “fate” of Intellectual Capital indicators: a case study

Author:

Chiucchi Maria Serena,Montemari Marco

Abstract

Purpose – Although several frameworks for measuring and reporting Intellectual Capital (IC) have been developed over the past two decades, their actual use in practice is still limited. The purpose of this paper is to answer the call to analyze IC practices from a critical and performative perspective by investigating how and why IC indicators may end up not being used, thus shedding light on the barriers to their use. Design/methodology/approach – The paper presents a single in-depth case study and focusses attention on the fragility of the IC indicators as well on the interactions that occur among subjects while transmitting IC indicators. Findings – The case analysis shows how the different perspectives and expectations that are at stake when subjects engage with IC indicators can play a central role in hindering or enabling their use in practice. Expecting IC indicators to be able to accurately represent and to objectively signal the size and the growth/decline of IC, i.e. to be complete and isomorphic measures, can act as a barrier to their use. The case also shows that scores play a role in hindering the use of the IC indicators; the subjects disputed the scores when they did not confirm their perception of reality, and the lack of completeness and isomorphism of the IC indicators, i.e. their fragility, was the reason put forward to justify the subjects’ refusal to accept the scores and thus, to use these measures. Research limitations/implications – Although the use of a single case study provides in-depth and rich data, it also limits the generalizability of the observations to other companies. Moreover, the findings obtained may be influenced by the specific IC framework and indicators adopted. Originality/value – Differently from most previous IC research, this paper focusses attention on the transmission of indicators and ultimately, on their “fate,” and it contributes to the understanding of how and why IC indicators may be produced but not used, thus hindering the diffusion of IC frameworks in practice.

Publisher

Emerald

Subject

General Business, Management and Accounting,Education

Reference50 articles.

1. Ahrens, T. and Dent, J.F. (1998), “Accounting and organizations: realizing the richness of field research”, Journal of Management Accounting Research , Vol. 10, pp. 1-39.

2. Alvesson, M. and Deetz, S. (2000), Doing Critical Management Research , Sage, London.

3. Andriessen, D. (2004), Making Sense of Intellectual Capital. Designing a Method for the Valuation of Intangibles , Elsevier Butterworth-Heinemann, Burlington, MA.

4. Baxter, J.A. and Chua, W.F. (1998), “Doing field research: practice and meta-theory in counterpoint”, Journal of Management Accounting Research , Vol. 10, pp. 69-87.

5. Catasús, B. and Gröjer, J.E. (2006), “Indicators: on visualizing, classifying and dramatizing”, Journal of Intellectual Capital , Vol. 7 No. 2, pp. 187-203.

Cited by 17 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3