Author:
Gounaris Spiros,Koritos Christos
Abstract
PurposeThe paper seeks to compare, through empirical evidence, two widely adopted models (the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) and the Diffusion of Innovations (DoI) model) to an underutilized one (Perceived Characteristics of the Innovation) in order to examine which is better in predicting consumer adoption of internet banking (IB), while investigating innovation attributes vis‐à‐vis other important predictors of adoption of innovations, such as consumer personal characteristics.Design/methodology/approachThe data derive from both users and non‐users of IB through a web survey. The paper assesses the psychometric properties of the measures through confirmatory factor analysis and then employs logistic regression analysis in order to assess and compare the ability of the models to accurately predict consumer adoption of IB.FindingsThe paper finds that PCI performed significantly better than TAM and DoI in predicting consumer adoption of IB, whereas the addition of consumer demographics and psychographics further improved the predictive ability of the overall logit model.Research limitations/implicationsLimitations of the study include the non‐random nature of the IB non‐users sample, and the fact that this was a study of a single shopping context (i.e. banking). Non‐usability innovation characteristics are important predictors of consumer adoption of technologically based innovations. Bank managers should reconsider their segmentation and targeting strategies in the light of more refined as well as new segmentation criteria.Originality/valueThe PCI model has never been examined within online contexts. The paper also incorporates other non‐usability types of characteristics (i.e. social, psychological) into TAM and DoI, and identifies the moderating role of shopping context, between innovation characteristics and decision to adopt.
Reference78 articles.
1. Agarwal, R. and Prasad, J. (1997), “The role of innovation characteristics and perceived voluntariness in the acceptance of information technologies”, Decision Sciences, Vol. 28, pp. 557‐82.
2. Arbuckle, J. (2006), Amos 7.0 User's Guide, Amos Development Corporation, Spring House, PA.
3. Assael, H. (2005), “A demographic and psychographic profile of heavy internet users and users by type of internet usage”, Journal of Advertising Research, Vol. 45 No. 1, pp. 93‐123.
4. Barbesino, P., Camerani, R. and Gaudino, A. (2005), “Digital finance in Europe: competitive dynamics and online behaviour”, Journal of Financial Services Marketing, Vol. 9 No. 4, pp. 329‐43.
5. Bateson, J. and Hoffman, D.K. (1999), Managing Services Marketing: Text and Readings, South Western College Publishing, Cincinnati, OH.
Cited by
99 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献