Author:
Grosvold Johanne,U. Hoejmose Stefan,K. Roehrich Jens
Abstract
Purpose
– The purpose of this study is to evaluate the relationships between management, measurement and performance of sustainability in supply chains. The authors develop a framework which explores these links through decoupling as articulated by the institutional theory. They draw on a conceptual continuum of reactive-proactive sustainable supply chain practices and identify clusters of companies along these dimensions and evaluate the theoretical and managerial implications of this for sustainability performance.
Design/methodology/approach
– This study uses primary and secondary datasets from 12 inductive, multiple case studies across different industries. This method ensures that we are better able to encapsulate a broader and more diverse set of practices and settings which in turn adds robustness to the theory we induced from our findings.
Findings
– The authors find varying degrees of alignment between management practices and measurement systems of sustainable supply chains. Some firms better align their sustainable supply chain management and measurement practices than others, resulting in tighter coupling and ultimately improved sustainability performance in the supply chain.
Research limitations/implications
– Further research may explore the conditions under which firms decouple their practices and the contextual settings that are associated with decoupling, loosely and tightly coupled alignment. Additionally, the conceptual framework should be tested across countries, industries and different relationships between public and private organisations.
Originality/value
– This is one of the first empirical explorations of the decoupling theory and the reactive-proactive continuum in sustainable supply chain management.
Subject
General Business, Management and Accounting
Reference48 articles.
1. Andersen, M.
and
Skjott-Larsen, T.
(2009), “Corporate social responsibility in global supply chains”, Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, Vol. 14 No. 2, pp. 75-86.
2. Awaysheh, A.
and
Klassen, R.D.
(2010), “The impact of supply chain structure on the use of supplier socially responsible practices”, International Journal of Operations and Production Management, Vol. 30 No. 12, pp. 1246-1268.
3. Bansal, P.
and
Roth, K.
(2000), “Why companies go green: a model of ecological responsiveness”, Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 43 No. 4, pp. 717-736.
4. Bititci, U.
,
Garengo, P.
,
Dörfler, V.
and
Nudurupati, S.
(2012), “Performance measurement: challenges for tomorrow”, International Journal of Management Reviews, Vol. 14 No. 3, pp. 305-327, doi: 10.1111/j.1468-2370.2011.00318.x
5. Bloom, N.
and
Van Reenen, J.
(2007), “Measuring and explaining management practices across firms and countries”, Quarterly Journal of Economics, Vol. 122 No. 4, pp. 1351-1408.
Cited by
119 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献