Author:
Wright Nat M.J.,Tompkins Charlotte N. E.,Farragher Tracey M.
Abstract
Purpose
– The purpose of this paper is to explore prison drug injecting prevalence, identify any changes in injecting prevalence and practice during imprisonment and explore views on prison needle exchange.
Design/methodology/approach
– An empirical prospective cohort survey conducted between 2006 and 2008. The study involved a random sample of 267 remand and sentenced prisoners from a large male category B prison in England where no prison needle exchange operates. Questionnaires were administered with prisoners on reception and, where possible, at one, three and six months during their sentence.
Findings
– In total, 64 per cent were injecting until admission into prison. The majority intended to stop injecting in prison (93 per cent), almost a quarter due to the lack of needle exchange (23 per cent). Yet when hypothetically asked if they would continue injecting in prison if needle exchange was freely available, a third of participants (33 per cent) believed that they would. Injecting cessation happened on prison entry and appeared to be maintained during the sentence.
Research limitations/implications
– Not providing sterile needles may increase risks associated with injecting for prisoners who continue to inject. However, providing such equipment may prolong injecting for other prisoners who currently cease injecting on account of needle exchange programmes (NEPs) not being provided in the UK prison setting.
Practical implications
– Not providing sterile needles may increase risks associated with injecting for prisoners who continue to inject. However, providing such equipment may prolong injecting for other prisoners who currently cease injecting on account of NEPs not being provided in the UK prison setting.
Originality/value
– This survey is the first to question specifically regarding the timing of injecting cessation amongst male prisoners and explore alongside intention to inject should needle exchange facilities be provided in prison.
Subject
Health Professions (miscellaneous)
Reference51 articles.
1. Brett, J.
(2012), “Why have prison needle exchange programmes not yet been rolled out in the UK?”,
British Medical Journal
, Vol. 345, p. e6211.
2. Bullock, T.
(2003), “Changing levels of drug use before, during and after imprisonment”, in
Ramsay, M.
(Ed.),
Prisoners’ Drug use and Treatment: Seven Research Studies, Home Office Research Study 267
, Home Office, London, pp. 23-48.
3. Carvell, A.L.M.
and
Hart, G.J.
(1990), “Risk behaviours for HIV infection amongst drug users in prison”,
British Medical Journal
, Vol. 300 No. 6737, pp. 1383-4.
4. Cinamon, H.
and
Bradshaw, R.
(2005), “Prison health in England”,
British Journal of Forensic Practice
, Vol. 7 No. 4, pp. 8-13.
5. Covell, R.G.
,
Frischer, M.
,
Taylor, A.
,
Goldberg, D.J.
,
Green, S.
,
McKeganey, N.P.
and
Bloor, M.
(1993), “Prison experience of injecting drug users in Glasgow”,
Drug and Alcohol Dependence
, Vol. 32 No. 1, pp. 9-14.
Cited by
28 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献