Challenges in co-designing an intervention to increase mobility in older patients: a qualitative study

Author:

Kirk Jeanette,Bandholm Thomas,Andersen Ove,Husted Rasmus Skov,Tjørnhøj-Thomsen Tine,Nilsen Per,Pedersen Mette MereteORCID

Abstract

PurposeThe aim of this study is to explore and discuss key challenges associated with having stakeholders take part in co-designing a health care intervention to increase mobility in older medical patients admitted to two medical departments at two hospitals in Denmark.Design/methodology/approachThe study used a qualitative design to investigate the challenges of co-designing an intervention in five workshops involving health professionals, patients and relatives. “Challenges” are understood as “situations of being faced with something that needs great mental or physical effort in order to be done successfully and therefore tests a person's ability” (Cambridge Dictionary). Thematic content analysis was conducted with a background in the analytical question: “What key challenges arise in the material in relation to the co-design process?”.FindingsTwo key challenges were identified: engagement and facilitation. These consisted of five sub-themes: recruiting patients and relatives, involving physicians, adjusting to a new researcher role, utilizing contextual knowledge and handling ethical dilemmas.Research limitations/implicationsThe population of patients and relatives participating in the workshops was small, which likely affected the co-design process.Practical implicationsResearchers who want to use co-design must be prepared for the extra time required and the need for skills concerning engagement, communication, facilitation, negotiation and resolution of conflict. Time is also required for ethical discussions and considerations concerning different types of knowledge creation.Originality/valueEngaging stakeholders in co-design processes is increasingly encouraged. This study documents the key challenges in such processes and reports practical implications.

Publisher

Emerald

Subject

Health Policy,Business, Management and Accounting (miscellaneous)

Reference93 articles.

1. Impact of patient involvement on clinical practice guideline development: a parallel group study;Implementation Science,2018

2. Managing clinical knowledge for health care improvement;Yearbook of Medical Informatics,2000

3. Evaluating the impact of service user involvement on research: a prospective case study: evaluating the impact of service user involvement on research;International Journal of Consumer Studies,2011

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3