Can team effectiveness be predicted?

Author:

Meredith Ross T.,Jones Erick C.,Adams Stephanie G.

Abstract

PurposeThe purpose of this paper is to propose and support a model to predict the effectiveness of teams.Design/methodology/approachThe literature provides a wide variety of variables or constructs to measure the effectiveness of a team. The article proposes a mathematical model to predict the effectiveness of a team. A priori comparisons are used to develop a mathematical model of the optimum team.FindingsThe study expands on the theory of team effectiveness and demonstrates that a theoretically developed empirical model can predict team effectiveness quantitatively. A mathematical model was developed as an empirical function of performance, behavior, attitude, team member style and corporate culture.Research limitations/implicationsThere has been little effort to standardize the measurable variables of team effectiveness. Additionally, the means to evaluate the individual's influence on team effectiveness has not been documented in relation to the effectiveness of the team. This paper uses a specific set of constructs, which might be the optimum set of variables to measure performance, behavior, and attitude.Practical implicationsBy considering the model suggested here, managers will be able to select individual team members to enhance team performance.Originality/valueFew models have been proposed to predict the effectiveness of a team based on team member selection. This model provides anyone selecting team members with a model to use when choosing among technically qualified candidates.

Publisher

Emerald

Subject

Management of Technology and Innovation,Management Information Systems,Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management

Reference47 articles.

1. Adams, S.G., Simon, L. and Ruiz, B. (2002), “A pilot study of the performance of student teams in engineering education”, Session 1017 Proceedings of the American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference, Montreal, June 16‐19.

2. Ancona, D. (1990), “Outward bound: strategies for team survival in an organization”, Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 39 No. 1, pp. 123‐48.

3. Ancona, D.G. and Caldwell, D.F. (1992), “Bridging the boundary: external activity and performance in organizational teams”, Administrative Science Quarterly, Vol. 37, pp. 634‐65.

4. Banks, H.T. and Tran, H.T. (1997), Mathematical and Experimental Modeling of Physical and Biological Processes, Chapman & Hall/CRC, Cincinnati, OH.

5. Bettenhausen, K.L. (1991), “Five years of groups research: what we have learned and what needs to be addressed”, Journal of Management, Vol. 17 No. 2, pp. 345‐81.

Cited by 26 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3