Methods and resources to monitor internet censorship

Author:

Fourie Ina,Bitso Constance,J.D. Bothma Theo

Abstract

Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to raise awareness of the importance for library and information services (LIS) to take the responsibility to find a manageable way to regularly monitor internet censorship in their countries, and to suggest a framework for such monitoring and to encourage manageable on-going small scale research projects. Design/methodology/approach – The paper follows on contract research for the IFLA Committee on Freedom of Access to Information and Freedom of Expression on country specific trends in internet censorship. Based on an extensive literature survey (not fully reflected here) and data mining, a framework is suggested for regular monitoring of country specific negative and positive trends in internet censorship. The framework addresses search strategies and information resources; setting up alerting services; noting resources for data mining; a detailed break-down and systematic monitoring of negative and positive trends; the need for reflection on implications, assessment of need(s) for concern (or not) and generation of suggestions for actions; sharing findings with the LIS community and wider society; and raising sensitivity for internet censorship as well as advocacy and lobbying against internet censorship. Apart from monitoring internet censorship, the framework is intended to encourage manageable on-going small scale research. Findings – A framework of internet censorship monitoring can support the regular, systematic and comprehensive monitoring of known as well as emerging negative and positive trends in a country, and can promote timely expressions of concerns and appropriate actions by LIS. It can support sensitivity to the dangers of internet censorship and raise LIS’ levels of self-efficacy in dealing with internet censorship and doing manageable, small scale research in this regard. Originality/value – Although a number of publications have appeared on internet censorship these do not offer a framework for monitoring internet censorship and encouraging manageable on-going small scale research in this regard.

Publisher

Emerald

Subject

Library and Information Sciences,Information Systems

Reference68 articles.

1. Akdeniz, Y. and Altiparmak, K. (2008), “Internet: restricted access: a critical assessment of Internet content regulation and censorsip in Turkey”, available at: http://privacy.cyber-rights.org.tr/?page_id=256 (accessed 3 March 2012).

2. Al-Saqaf, W. (2010), “Internet censorship challenged-how circumvention technologies can effectively outwit governments attempts to filter content. Alkasir case study”, in Strand, C. (Ed.), Increasing Transparency and Fighting Corruption Through ICT: Empowering People and Communities, The Swedish Program for ICT in Developing Regions, SPIDER, Stockholm, pp. 71-89.

3. Anderson, M. (2007), “Internet censorship: as bad as you thought it was-maybe a bit worse, actually”, available at: http://spectrum.ieee.org/telecom/internet/internet-censorship-as-bad-as-you-thought-it-was (accessed 26 March 2012).

4. Ang, P. and Nadarajan, B. (1996), “Censorship and the internet: a Singapore perspective”, Communications of the Association for Computing, Vol. 39 No. 6, pp. 72-78.

5. Anonymous (2009), “Berkman center rides herd [sic] on internet censorship”, Newsletter on Intellectual Freedom, Vol. 58 No. 3, p. -.

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. How open is open access research in Library and Information Science?;South African Journal of Libraries and Information Science;2018-08

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3