User search terms and controlled subject vocabularies in an institutional repository

Author:

Hanrath ScottORCID,Radio Erik

Abstract

Purpose The purpose of this paper is to investigate the search behavior of institutional repository (IR) users in regard to subjects as a means of estimating the potential impact of applying a controlled subject vocabulary to an IR. Design/methodology/approach Google Analytics data were used to record cases where users arrived at an IR item page from an external web search and subsequently downloaded content. Search queries were compared against the Faceted Application of Subject Terminology (FAST) schema to determine the topical nature of the queries. Queries were also compared against the item’s metadata values for title and subject using approximate string matching to determine the alignment of the queries with current metadata values. Findings A substantial portion of successful user search queries to an IR appear to be topical in nature. User search queries matched values from FAST at a higher rate than existing subject metadata. Increased attention to subject description in IR records may provide an opportunity to improve the search visibility of the content. Research limitations/implications The study is limited to a particular IR. Data from Google Analytics does not provide comprehensive search query data. Originality/value The study presents a novel method for analyzing user search behavior to assist IR managers in determining whether to invest in applying controlled subject vocabularies to IR content.

Publisher

Emerald

Subject

Library and Information Sciences,Information Systems

Reference23 articles.

1. Invisible institutional repositories addressing the low indexing ratios of IRs in Google Scholar;Library Hi Tech,2012

2. Bibliographic Services Task Force of the University of California Libraries (2005), “Rethinking how we provide bibliographic services for the University of California: final report”, Bibliographic Services Task Force of the University of California Libraries, available at: http://libraries.universityofcalifornia.edu/sopag/BSTF/Final.pdf (accessed November 1, 2016).

3. A faceted approach to subject data in the dublin core metadata record;Journal of Internet Cataloging,2001

4. Repository metadata: approaches and challenges;Cataloging & Classification Quarterly,2009

Cited by 8 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3