Author:
Rabii Anass,Assoul Saliha,Ouazzani Touhami Khadija,Roudies Ounsa
Abstract
Purpose
This paper aims to clarify the uncertainty reflected in the current state of information security maturity evaluation where it has not enough matured and converged so that a generic approach or many specfics approaches become the go-to choice. In fact, in the past decade, many secruity maturity models are still being produced and remain unproven regardless of the existence of ISO 21827.
Design/methodology/approach
The authors have used the systematic literature review to summarize existing research, help identify gaps in the existing literature and provide background for positioning new research studies.
Findings
The authors highlighted the prevalent influence of the ISO/IEC 27001/27002 standard but raised the necessity for an in-depth investigation of ISO 21827. The authors also made the implementation facet a central topic of our review. The authors found out that, compared to the number of proposed models, implementation experiments are lacking. This could be due to the arduous task of validation and it could also be the reason why specific models are dominant.
Originality/value
While the research literature contains many experience reports and a few case studies on information security maturity evaluation, a systematic review and synthesis of this growing field of research is unavailable as far as the authors know. In fact, the authors only picked-up one bodywork [Maturity models in cyber security A systematic review (2017)] carrying out a literature review on security maturity models between 2012 and 2017, written in Spanish.
Subject
Management of Technology and Innovation,Information Systems and Management,Computer Networks and Communications,Information Systems,Software,Management Information Systems
Reference50 articles.
1. A cyclical evaluation model of information security maturity;Information Management and Computer Security,2014
2. A comparison of American and Moroccan governmental security approaches,2018
3. ANSSI (2018a), “Publication: guide relatif à la maturité SSI”, available at: www.ssi.gouv.fr/guide/guide-relatif-a-la-maturite-ssi/ (accessed 30 December 2018)
4. ANSSI (2018b), “Publication: guide relatif à la maturité SSI”, available at: www.ssi.gouv.fr/guide/guide-relatif-a-la-maturite-ssi/ (accessed 30 December 2018)
5. Writing narrative literature reviews;Review of General Psychology,1997
Cited by
31 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献