Abstract
PurposePersonal branding is a strategic tool of marketing and communication to define success in organisations. While it constitutes a conscious attempt to commodify self and audit self, it must be intentionally managed to obtain its optimum results. This study aims to illustrate how personal branding may also pose unintentional and unconscious strategic tool for women academics in academia to help them get wider visibility and increase their chances of getting into leadership positions.Design/methodology/approachWe employed a case study approach and convenience sampling to select our unit of analysis. Three universities in both public and private universities in the eastern regions of Indonesia were purposefully selected, and interviews were held with 30 female leaders occupying and occupied middle and lower leadership hierarchies.FindingsOur research shows that, despite their unintentional, unplanned and poorly designed personal branding, women have been able to advance to their current leadership positions by building their own rooms for practising their own preferred leadership values to get them visible and heard. This way is performed through a gendered networking, previous leadership experience and bureaucratic requirements. The consequence of such a practice may limit the range of visibility to getting noticed as worthy individuals for senior leadership roles. This might be one reason why women are scarcely found in senior leadership positions.Originality/valueWe propose that natural strategies of constructing, narrating and marketing or communicating personal branding in academia through authentic actions can also be helpful for the success of women to get to leadership roles in a smaller and ambient environment.
Reference57 articles.
1. Hierarchies, jobs, bodies: a theory of gendered organization;Gender and Society,1990
2. Citations, citation indicators, and research quality: an overview of basic concepts and theories;SAGE Open,2019
3. Aruan, C. (2019), “Human resources and gender in higher education Indonesia)”, available at: www.ksi-indonesia.org/id/pengetahuan (accessed 10 March 2022).
4. Do they agree ? Bibliometric evaluation versus informed peer review in the Italian research assessment exercise,2016