Abstract
PurposeDespite the increasing studies concerning external knowledge for innovative firms or for innovations, little research demonstrates as what are those capabilities that enable firms to explore and assess high-valuable knowledge. The aim of this study is to examine those capabilities that aid innovative firms to search and identify the potential knowledge for open innovation. This study is an empirical and theoretical examination of knowledge search and identification capabilities of the UK-based biotechnology firms. The literature has been drawn from the research streams into knowledge management, open innovation and dynamic capabilities.Design/methodology/approachForty-five semi-structured interviews with senior-level innovation and R&D managers were completed, and thematic analysis using NVivo 12 was performed.FindingsEvidence from 45 interviews with senior-level innovation and R&D managers in the UK-based biotechnology firms and thematic analysis was used to develop a process framework capturing the key capabilities. By identifying the role and contribution of each of the capabilities in knowledge identification in the practices of open innovation, this study contributes to open innovation and knowledge management literature.Practical implicationsManagerial implications suggest knowledge-oriented leads greatly influence the development of identification capabilities. Hence, firms with knowledge-oriented leads are better crafted approaches to achieve competitive advantages in the practices of open innovation.Originality/valueThis study offers a new theoretical perspective and empirical evidence to view knowledge identification capabilities as the dynamic capabilities. This study offers a process framework of identification capabilities.
Reference131 articles.
1. Service innovation strategy and process: a cross-national comparative analysis;International Marketing Review,2006
2. Exploring the antecedents of innovation performance: the roles of entrepreneurial orientation, learning orientation and organisational learning;International Journal of Business Excellence,2018
3. Almeida, P., Phene, A. and Grant, R. (2003), “Innovation and knowledge management. Scanning, sourcing and integration”, in Easterby-Smith, M. and Lyles, M.A. (Eds), Organizational Learning and Knowledge Management, Blackwell Publishing, London, pp. 356-371.
4. Product innovation of domestic firms versus foreign MNE subsidiaries: the role of external knowledge sources;Technological Forecasting and Social Change,2022
5. From technological inventions to new products: a systematic review and research agenda of the main enabling factors;European Management Review,2015