The impact of facilities management on patient outcomes

Author:

May Daryl,Pinder James

Abstract

PurposeThe purpose of this paper is to investigate the extent to which practicing National Health Service (NHS) facilities managers thought that the contribution of facilities management (FM) could be measured in terms of health outcomes.Design/methodology/approachA questionnaire was distributed to NHS facilities or estate managers from the majority of NHS trusts in England and Wales.FindingsIn general, there is little or no evidence from pre‐existing research to prove the contribution of FM in terms of health outcomes. However, in spite of this, 59 per cent of facilities managers in the NHS believe that the contribution of FM could be measured yet only a relatively small number of Trusts (16 per cent) have attempted to measure the contribution of FM. The analysis of the secondary data does not show any conclusive evidence of a correlation between FM and health outcomes.Research limitations/implicationsThe scope of the study did not extend to collecting empirical evidence to prove the contribution of FM to health outcomes – it was only focusing on whether facilities managers thought it was possible, and if so how they would measure the contribution. However, as part of the project some secondary data were tested for a relationship between FM services and health outcomes.Originality/valueThis is the first time any study has gathered opinion from facilities managers as to whether they believe their contribution can be measured in terms of organisational outcomes, in this case patient care or health outcomes. It provides a useful starting point in order to develop a future study to prove the contribution from FM to health outcomes.

Publisher

Emerald

Subject

Building and Construction,Architecture,Human Factors and Ergonomics

Reference19 articles.

1. Bootle, R. and Kalyan, S. (2002), Property in Business – a Waste of Space?, RICS, London, pp. 1‐92.

2. Coulter, A. and Henderson, L. (2004), Patients' Experience of Choosing Where to Undergo Surgical Treatment, Picker Institute Europe, Oxford.

3. DoH (2000), The NHS Plan: A Plan for Investment. A Plan for Reform, HMSO, London.

4. DoH (2003a), Winning Ways: Working Together to Reduce Healthcare Associated Infection in England, HMSO, London.

5. DoH (2003b), Standards of Cleanliness in the NHS – A Framework in Which to Measure Performance Outcomes, HMSO, London.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3