Quality improvement of technical education in Saudi Arabia: self-evaluation perspective
Author:
A. Alzamil Zakarya
Abstract
Purpose
– In Saudi Arabia, technical education is managed by Technical and Vocational Training Corporation. However, there is no independent accrediting body to accredit the technical institutes and assure its quality, which causes the lack of unified quality assurance standards and manageable quality improvement processes. The purpose of this paper is to propose self-evaluation standards to help the technical institutes to evaluate their performance.
Design/methodology/approach
– The author has used a brainstorming technique of local practitioners in quality assurance. Such technique was performed by adopting DACUM that stands for “Developing A CurriculUM”. The author has used a heuristic educational and training process as the foundation of the standards and processes development, namely; curriculum, environment, training managements, and instructors. A team has been established that has been trained locally and abroad on the quality assurance standards and processes. The team studied several quality frameworks of the different countries to come up with guidelines for quality self-evaluation and standards.
Findings
– The author has found that such an approach is a very effective tool for improving the institutes' performance and gives them the flexibility to decide about their missions. Most of institutes' staff is reluctant to participate in the self-evaluation process because of the fear it may reveal their weaknesses, but with encouragement and motivation especially from the top management they tend to participate in such a process. Self-evaluation helps the educational institutes to be benchmarked with other international institutions, in which good practices may be adopted by the institutes' managements to achieve their vision.
Research limitations/implications
– The proposed approach can help the technical education institutes to manage their quality system. In addition, the implementation of such an approach might be the starting point to develop a quality system framework for the technical education in Saudi Arabia. However, further investigation is needed to measure whether applying such standards may help the technical education institutes to meet the required quality standards to attain an accreditation from the international quality agencies.
Originality/value
– The proposed guidelines for quality standards and processes is a contribution in the accreditation and quality assurance processes for many public and private institutions in Saudi Arabia. In addition, it is an important step to standardize the quality processes.
Reference31 articles.
1. Achim, M.I.
,
Căbulea, L.
,
Popa, M.
and
Mihalache, S.-S.
(2009), “On the role of benchmarking in the higher education quality assessment”, Annales Universitatis Apulensis Series Oeconomica, Vol. 11 No. 2. 2. Australian Quality Training Framework (AQTF)
(2010), Users' Guide to the Essential Conditions and Standards for Continuing Registration, Commonwealth of Australia, Australia. 3. Barnabè, F.
and
Riccaboni, A.
(2007), “Which role for performance measurement system in higher education? Focus on quality assurance in Italy”, Studies in Educational Evaluation, Vol. 33 Nos 3-4, pp. 302-319. 4. Boehm, B.
(1988), “A spiral model of software development and enhancement”, IEEE Computer, Vol. 21 No. 5, pp. 61-72. 5. Bollaert, L.
,
Brus, S.
,
Curvale, B.
,
Harvey, L.
,
Helle, E.
,
Jensen, H.T.
,
Komljenovic˘, J.
,
Orphanides, A.
and
Sursock, A.
(2007), Embedding Quality Culture in Higher Education; A Selection of Papers from the 1st European Forum for Quality Assurance, The European University Association, Brussels.
Cited by
4 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|