Author:
Singh Mahesh,Paliwal Jaiprakash,Rao Manoj Kumar,Raibagkar Shirish
Abstract
Purpose
In India, national accreditation agencies stipulate that internal quality control in higher education institutions (HEIs) is to be institutionalized through internal quality assurance cells that are responsible for implementing and controlling quality systems. As the concept of goal congruence is central to a control process, this study aims to examine whether goal congruence is observed in such institutions. The impact of the absence of goal congruence on the quality of performance in higher education was also examined.
Design/methodology/approach
This cross-sectional study measured the impact of goal congruence or the lack thereof on the performance quality of HEIs as defined in the evaluation criteria of the apex accreditation agency, the National Assessment and Accreditation Council. Two hypotheses were tested using t-tests and regression analysis. Focus group discussions were conducted to elicit participants’ suggestions.
Findings
The results showed a lack of goal congruence between HEIs’ quality goals and their faculty’s personal goals, which adversely impacts the quality of their performance, as indicated by an average disagreement of 81% on a ten-statement scale. Goal congruence as an independent variable explained 63% of the variability in HEIs’ performance quality, and the results were statistically significant, indicating that lack of goal congruence is an important contributor to poor performance among HEIs.
Originality/value
Accreditation of HEIs is a global practice; hence, the findings of this study and the importance of goal congruence apply not only to India but also to HEIs globally.
Reference67 articles.
1. All India Council for Technical Education (2023), “List of AICTE approved institutes”, available at: https://facilities.aicte-india.org/dashboard/pages/angulardashboard.php#!/approved (accessed 14 April 2023).
2. Strategic human resource management in higher education institutions: empirical evidence from Saudi;Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences,2016
3. Barker, K.C. (2002), “Canadian recommended e-learning guidelines”, Vancouver, BC: FuturEd for Canadian Association for Community Education and Office of Learning Technologies, HRDC, available at: www.futured.com/pdf/CanREGs%20Eng.pdf (accessed 25 April 2023).
4. Quality assurance in higher education: the evolution of systems and design ideals;New Directions for Institutional Research,1998