Author:
Gibilaro Lucia,Mattarocci Gianluca
Abstract
Purpose
This paper aims to examine the relevance of cross-border activity in the European banking sector, evaluating the role of differences in regulation to explain the level of interest in entering foreign markets.
Design/methodology/approach
The sample considers all banks in the European Union (EU 28) existing at year-end 2017, and information about the ultimate owners’ nationality to classify local and foreign banks is collected. The analysis provides a mapping of regulatory restrictions for foreign banks and evaluates how they impact the role of foreign players in the deposit and lending markets.
Findings
Results show that the lower are the capital adequacy requirements, the higher are the amounts of loans and deposits offered by non-European Economic Area banks and, additionally, the higher the probability of having a foreign bank operating in the country.
Originality/value
This paper provides new evidence on regulatory arbitrage opportunities in the EU and outlines differences among EU countries not previously studied.
Reference68 articles.
1. Does macroprudential regulation leak? Evidence from a UK policy experiment;Journal of Money, Credit and Banking,2014
2. The decision to establish a foreign bank branch or subsidiary: an application of binary classification system;The Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis,1982
3. Barth, J.R., Caprio, G. and Levine, R. (2002), “Bank regulation and supervision: what works best?”, working paper n. 9323, NBER, New York, NY.
4. Financial integration and risk sharing in a monetary union,2016
5. Globalization of financial institutions: evidence from cross-border banking performance;Brookings-Wharton Papers on Financial Services,2000
Cited by
2 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献