Author:
Li Yanghong,Wang Yahao,Chen Yutao,Rong X.W.,Zhao Yuliang,Wu Shaolei,Dong Erbao
Abstract
Purpose
The current difficulties of distribution network working robots are mainly in the performance and operation mode. On the one hand, high-altitude power operation tasks require high load-carrying capacity and dexterity of the robot; on the other hand, the fully autonomous mode is uncontrollable and the teleoperation mode has a high failure rate. Therefore, this study aims to design a distribution network operation robot named Sky-Worker to solve the above two problems.
Design/methodology/approach
The heterogeneous arms of Sky-Worker are driven by hydraulics and electric motors to solve the contradiction between high load-carrying capacity and high flexibility. A human–robot collaborative shared control architecture is built to realize real-time human intervention during autonomous operation, and control weights are dynamically assigned based on energy optimization.
Findings
Simulations and tests show that Sky-Worker has good dexterity while having a high load capacity. Based on Sky-Worker, multiuser tests and practical application experiments show that the designed shared-control mode effectively improves the success rate and efficiency of operations compared with other current operation modes.
Practical implications
The designed heterogeneous dual-arm distribution robot aims to better serve distribution line operation tasks.
Originality/value
For the first time, the integration of hydraulic and motor drives into a distribution network operation robot has achieved better overall performance. A human–robot cooperative shared control framework is proposed for remote live-line working robots, which provides better operation results than other current operation modes.
Reference27 articles.
1. Robotics for distribution power lines: overview of the last decade,2012
2. Single-master/multi-slave haptic teleoperation: a force control scheme;Industrial Robot: The International Journal of Robotics Research and Application,2022
3. Learning robot objectives from physical human interaction;Proceedings of Machine Learning Research,2017
4. The mathematical meaninglessness of the NASA task load index: a level of measurement analysis;IEEE Transactions on Human-Machine Systems,2023
5. A survey of high-level teleoperation, monitoring and task assignment to autonomous mobile robots,2022