Research Data Management as a “wicked problem”

Author:

Awre Chris,Baxter Jim,Clifford Brian,Colclough Janette,Cox Andrew,Dods Nick,Drummond Paul,Fox Yvonne,Gill Martin,Gregory Kerry,Gurney Anita,Harland Juliet,Khokhar Masud,Lowe Dawn,O'Beirne Ronan,Proudfoot Rachel,Schwamm Hardy,Smith Andrew,Verbaan Eddy,Waller Liz,Williamson Laurian,Wolf Martin,Zawadzki Matthew

Abstract

Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to explore the usefulness of the concept to thinking about Research Data Management (RDM). The concept of “wicked problems” seeks to differentiate very complex, intractable challenges from tamer issues where approaches to problem solving are well-understood. Design/methodology/approach – The paper is based on and co-authored by a collaboration of practitioners from libraries, information technology and research administration, with facilitators from the Sheffield Information School. Participants worked together in two-day-long workshops to understand the wicked problem concept and advice on leadership in wicked problem contexts. Findings – Participants concurred that RDM had many features of a wicked problem and most of Grint’s advice on leadership for wicked problems also resonated. Some elements of the issue were simple; participants were optimistic about improving the situation over time. Participants were resistant to the more negative or fatalistic connotations of the phrase “wicked problem”. Viewing RDM as a wicked problem is an interesting way of looking at it as a challenge for support professionals. Practical implications – The notion of a wicked problem is a generative concept that can be usefully added to professional vocabulary. Originality/value – The paper captures an in-depth response from practitioners to the notion of wicked problems as a lens for examining RDM.

Publisher

Emerald

Subject

Library and Information Sciences

Reference21 articles.

1. Borgman, C. (2015), Big Data, Little Data, No Data: Scholarship in the Networked World , MIT Press, Cambridge.

2. Brown, T. (2008), “Design thinking”, Harvard Business Review , Vol. 86 No. 6, pp. 84-95.

3. Checkland, P. (Ed.) (1981), Systems Thinking, Systems Practice , John Wiley, London.

4. Conklin, E.J. and Weil, W. (1997), “Wicked problems naming the pain in organizations”, available at: http://kodu.ut.ee/∼maarjakr/creative/wicked.pdf (accessed 19 March 2015).

5. Corrall, S. , Kennan, M.A. and Afzal, W. (2013), “Bibliometrics and research data management: emerging trends in library research support services”, Library Trends , Vol. 61 No. 3, pp. 636-674.

Cited by 18 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3