Abstract
PurposeIn this paper, the impact of the 2004 European Union accession on income inequalities within New Member States is analyzed.Design/methodology/approachAn empirical analysis is conducted with nine New Member States over the period 1991–2015, with 55 economies serving as a control group. The newly introduced (by de Chaisemartin and D’Haultfœuille, 2023) method belonging to the family of difference-in-differences (DID) estimators is applied to allow for multiple non-binary treatments.FindingsWhile accession to the European Union had a positive and significant impact on the market and net Gini coefficients in the treated countries, no evidence of the impact of accession on redistribution was found. Single-unit estimates signal that income inequalities rose due to EU membership in some member countries; the most convincing evidence shows that income distribution in Latvia was especially affected.Originality/valueThe author applied the method which addresses the presence of multiple non-binary treatments. Full-fledged membership was preceded by association status, and accession to the EU was accompanied or followed by engagement in other layers of integration (European Monetary Union and Schengen Area). Controlling for these features, the author was able to assess whether the pure EU effect contributed to increases in income inequalities.
Reference44 articles.
1. Inequality implications of European economic and monetary union membership: a reassessment;Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space,2018
2. European integration and income inequality;American Sociological Review,2006
3. Bergin, P.R. and Lin, C.Y. (2009), “Exchange rate regimes and the extensive margin of trade”, in Frankel, J.A. and Pissarides, C.A. (Eds), NBER International Seminar on Macroeconomics 2008, The University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL, pp. 201-227.
4. Melting pot or salad bowl: some evidence from U.S. investments abroad;Journal of Financial Markets,2008
5. Regional integration and income inequality: a synthetic counterfactual analysis of the European Monetary Union;Oxford Review of Economic Policy,2021