Author:
Pelegrini Morita Plinio,Marie Burns Catherine
Abstract
Purpose
– Computer-mediated communication systems (CMCSs) have become the standard for supporting virtual teamwork. However, interpersonal trust formation though CMCSs is impaired due to limited media richness of the communication channels. The aim of this paper is to identify trust forming cues that occur naturally in face-to-face environments and are suitable to include in CMCSs design, to facilitate greater trust in virtual teams.
Design/methodology/approach
– To select cues that had a strong effect on fostering trust behaviour, a non-participatory ethnographic study was conducted. Two student teams at the University of Waterloo were observed for 6-12 months. Researchers identified mechanisms used for building trust and bridging team developmental barriers.
Findings
– The paper identifies five trust tokens that were effective in developing trust and bridging team developmental barriers: expertise, recommendations, social capital, willingness to help/benevolence, and validation of information. These behavioural cues, or behavioural trust tokens, which are present in face-to-face collaborations, carry important trust supporting information that leads to increased trust, improved collaboration, and knowledge integration. These tokens have the potential to improve CMCSs by supplementing the cues necessary for trust formation in virtual environments.
Practical implications
– This study identifies important mechanisms used for fostering trust behaviour in face-to-face collaborations that have the potential to be included in the design of CMCSs (via interface design objects) and have implications for interface designers, team managers, and researchers in the field of teamwork.
Originality/value
– This work presents the first ethnographic study of trust between team members for the purpose of providing improved computer support for virtual collaboration via redesigned interface components.
Subject
Management of Technology and Innovation,Management Information Systems,Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management
Reference124 articles.
1. Adams, B.D.
and
Webb, R.D.G.
(2002), “Trust in small military teams”, paper presented at 7th International Command and Control Technology Symposium, Quebec City, paper 6.
2. Ahn, J.
,
DeAngelis, D.
and
Barber, S.
(2007) pp. 229-235, “Attitude driven team formation using multi-dimensional trust”, 2007 IEEE/WIC/ACM International Conference on Intelligent Agent Technology (IAT'07), IEEE, pp. 229-235.
3. Aljukhadar, M.
,
Senecal, S.
and
Ouellette, D.
(2010), “Can the media richness of a privacy disclosure enhance outcome? A multifaceted view of trust in rich media environments”, International Journal of Electronic Commerce, Vol. 14 No. 4, pp. 103-126.
4. Aragon, C.R.
and
Williams, A.
(2011), “Collaborative creativity: a complex systems model with distributed affect”, Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, ACM, New York, NY, pp. 1875-1884.
5. Ashton, R.H.
and
Kramer, S.S.
(1980), “Students as surrogates in behavioral accounting research: some evidence”, Journal of Accounting Research, Vol. 18 No. 1, pp. 1-15.
Cited by
19 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献