The complex territory of well‐being: contestable evidence, contentious theories and speculative conclusions

Author:

Carlisle Sandra,Hanlon Phil

Abstract

This paper brings together evidence and theories from a number of disciplines and thinkers that highlight multiple, sometimes incommensurable understandings about well‐being. We identify three broad strands or themes within the literature(s) that frame both the nature of the problem and its potential solutions in different ways. The first strand can be categorised as the ‘hard’ science of wellbeing and its stagnation or decline in modern western society. In a second strand, social and political theory suggests that conceptualisations of well‐being are shaped by aspects of western culture, often in line with the demands of a capitalist economic system. A third theme pursues the critique of consumer culture's influence on well‐being but in the context of broader human problems. This approach draws on ecology, ethics, philosophy and much else to suggest that we urgently need to reconsider what it means to be human, if we are to survive and thrive. Although no uncontroversial solutions are found within any of these themes, all play a necessary part in contributing to knowledge of this complex territory, where assumptions about the nature of the human condition come into question.

Publisher

Emerald

Subject

Psychiatry and Mental health,Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health

Cited by 16 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Our Calculable Selves: The Rise and Hegemony of Well-Being Discourse;Sustainability, Wellbeing and the Posthuman Turn;2018-07-11

2. Which ‘being’ in wellbeing? Ontology, wellness and the geographies of happiness;Progress in Human Geography;2017-07-05

3. Wellbeing Impacts of City Policies for Reducing Greenhouse Gas Emissions;International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health;2014-11-28

4. Everyday translation: health practitioners’ perspectives on obesity and metabolic disorders in Samoa;Critical Public Health;2014-04-16

5. The rhetoric/reality gap in social determinants of mental health;Mental Health Review Journal;2013-11-29

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3