Author:
Agarwal Renu,Green Roy,Agarwal Neeru,Randhawa Krithika
Abstract
Purpose
– The purpose of this paper is to investigate the quality of management practices of public hospitals in the Australian healthcare system, specifically those in the state-managed health systems of Queensland and New South Wales (NSW). Further, the authors assess the management practices of Queensland and NSW public hospitals jointly and globally benchmark against those in the health systems of seven other countries, namely, USA, UK, Sweden, France, Germany, Italy and Canada.
Design/methodology/approach
– In this study, the authors adapt the unique and globally deployed Bloom et al. (2009) survey instrument that uses a “double blind, double scored” methodology and an interview-based scoring grid to measure and internationally benchmark the management practices in Queensland and NSW public hospitals based on 21 management dimensions across four broad areas of management – operations, performance monitoring, targets and people management.
Findings
– The findings reveal the areas of strength and potential areas of improvement in the Queensland and NSW Health hospital management practices when compared with public hospitals in seven countries, namely, USA, UK, Sweden, France, Germany, Italy and Canada. Together, Queensland and NSW Health hospitals perform best in operations management followed by performance monitoring. While target management presents scope for improvement, people management is the sphere where these Australian hospitals lag the most.
Practical implications
– This paper is of interest to both hospital administrators and health care policy-makers aiming to lift management quality at the hospital level as well as at the institutional level, as a vehicle to consistently deliver sustainable high-quality health services.
Originality/value
– This study provides the first internationally comparable robust measure of management capability in Australian public hospitals, where hospitals are run independently by the state-run healthcare systems. Additionally, this research study contributes to the empirical evidence base on the quality of management practices in the Australian public healthcare systems of Queensland and NSW.
Subject
Health Policy,Business, Management and Accounting (miscellaneous)
Reference78 articles.
1. Addicott, R.
(2008), “Models of governance and the changing role of the board in the ‘modernised’ UK health sector”,
Journal of Health Organization and Management
, Vol. 22 No. 2, pp. 147-163.
2. Adzei, F.A.
and
Atinga, R.A.
(2012), “Motivation and retention of health workers in Ghana’s district hospitals: addressing the critical issues”,
Journal of Health Organization and Management
, Vol. 26 No. 4, pp. 467-485.
3. Anderson, R.A.
,
Issel, L.M.
and
McDaniel, R.R. Jr
(2003), “Nursing homes as complex adaptive systems: relationship between management practice and resident outcomes”,
Nursing Research
, Vol. 52 No. 1, pp. 12-21.
4. Australian Government of the Australian Capital Territory, New South Wales, Northern Territory, Queensland, South Australia, Tasmania, Victoria and Western Australia
(2007), “Caring for our health? – a report card on the Australian Government’s performance on health care”, NSW Department of Health, Brookvale, available at: www.health.nsw.gov.au/pubs/2006/pdf/chroniccare_3.pdf (accessed 18 March 2013).
5. Aveling, E.
,
Martin, G.
,
Armsrong, N.
,
Banerjee, J.
and
Dixon-Woods, M.
(2012), “Quality improvement through clinical communities: eight lessons for practice”,
Journal of Health Organization and Management
, Vol. 26 No. 2, pp. 158-174.
Cited by
10 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献