Author:
Rosen Alan,Holmes Douglas John
Abstract
Purpose
This study aims to demonstrate how service providers, service users and their families should be able to share the co-leadership, co-auspicing, co-ownership, and co-governance, of a the mental health-care ecosystem, at every level, as it develops upwards and wider, in a process of inclusivity, conviviality and polyphonic discourse, via the overlapping phases of co-creativity, codesign, co-production, co-delivery, co-evaluation, co-research and co-replication, to achieve outcomes of co-communal or organisational well-being.
Design/methodology/approach
“Co-design” is shorthand code for encouraging multiple pathways and trajectories toward forming and sustaining a sparkling web or vibrant network of inclusive opportunities for stakeholder participation and a collaborative partnership in organizational development, in these circumstances, for more effective mental health services (MHSs).
Findings
In a co-design framework, all partners should be entitled to expect and “to have and to hold” an ongoing equal stake, voice and power in the discourse from start to finish, in a bottom-up process which is fostered by an interdisciplinary leadership group, providing the strong foundation or nutrient-rich and well-watered soil and support from which a shared endeavor can grow, blossom and generate the desired fruit in ample quality and quantity.
Originality/value
The authors should be working toward co-design and co-production of contemporary MHSs in a mental health-care ecosystem.
Reference54 articles.
1. Alakeson, V. and Perkins, R. (2012), “Recovery, personalisation and personal budgets”, Centre for Mental Health, September 2012, Retrieved from Recovery, personalisation and personal budgets, Centre for Mental Health.
2. A ladder of citizen participation;Journal of the American Institute of Planners,1969
3. Mental health service use and need for care of Australians without diagnoses of mental disorders: findings from a large epidemiological survey;Epidemiology and Psychiatric Sciences,2017
4. Boyle, D. and Harris, M. (2009), “The challenge of co-production: how equal partnerships between professionals and the public are crucial to improving public services”, Nef/NESTA, available at: www.nesta.org.uk
5. Social systems intervention and crisis resolution;Part 1: Assessment, Advances in Psychiatric Treatment,2003
Cited by
6 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献