Managerial level, personality and intelligence

Author:

Furnham Adrian,Crump John,Chamorro‐Premuzic Tomas

Abstract

PurposeThe purpose of this paper is to investigate whether managers at different levels differ in terms of ability and personality.Design/methodology/approachAssessment centre results for over a thousand managers on two cognitive and two non‐cognitive tests were subject to analysis of variance.FindingsNon‐manager specialists scored highest on one ability test, but lowest on the other. Senior managers had highest Expressed Inclusion and Control scores but lowest Wanted Inclusion and Control scores. Non‐managers were found to be most diligent and dutiful.Research limitations/implicationsLevel is inevitably confounded with age and experience, which may impact onto the individual difference variables making it difficult to accurately attribute causality.Practical implicationsIt is important to use psychometric test data to help in selection of all managers. Different levels require different profiles.Originality/valueAn exploration of individual differences in a large sample of managers that may relate to promotion to senior management levels.

Publisher

Emerald

Subject

Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management,Management Science and Operations Research,Applied Psychology,Social Psychology

Reference53 articles.

1. Bertua, C., Anderson, N. and Salgado, J. (2005), “The predictive validity of cognitive ability tests”, Journal of Occupational and Organisational Psychology, Vol. 78 No. 3, pp. 387‐405.

2. Blinkhorn, S. (1985), Graduate and Managerial Assessment Manual and User Guide, Dorset Press, Dorchester.

3. Chamorro‐Premuzic, T. and Furnham, A. (2005), Personality and Intellectual Competence, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, NJ.

4. Costa, P. Jr and McCrae, R. (1992), Revised NEO Personality Inventory (NEO‐PI‐R) and NEO Five‐factor Inventory (NEO‐FFI): Professional Manual, Psychological Assessment Resources, Odessa, FL.

5. Dancer, L. and Woods, S. (2006), “Higher‐order factor structure and intercorrelations of the 16PFS and the FIRO‐B”, International Journal of Selection and Assessment, Vol. 14, pp. 385‐91.

Cited by 20 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3