Power distance as a moderator of the relationship between justice and employee outcomes in a sample of Chinese employees

Author:

Begley Thomas M.,Lee Cynthia,Fang Yongqing,Li Jianfeng

Abstract

Power distance was tested as a moderator of the relationship between justice concerns and employee outcomes in a sample of employees in the People’s Republic of China. Two hypotheses were developed based on the quality of authority‐member relations prescribed by the relational model of authority in groups. In two‐way interactions, higher power distance combined with procedural justice to predict employee outcomes, whereas lower power distance combined with distributive justice.

Publisher

Emerald

Subject

Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management,Management Science and Operations Research,Applied Psychology,Social Psychology

Reference90 articles.

1. Ackerman, G. and Brockner, J. (1996), “Comparing the role of voice in the People’s Republic of China and the United States: the mediating effect of power distance”, paper presented at the annual meeting of the Academy of Management, Cincinnati, OH.

2. Adams, J.S. (1965), “Inequity in social exchange”, in Berkowitz, L. (Ed.), Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, Academic Press, New York, NY, pp. 267‐99.

3. Aryee, S. and Chay, Y.W. (2001), “Workplace justice, citizenship behavior and turnover intentions in a union context: examining the mediating role of perceived union support and union instrumentality”, Journal of Applied Psychology, Vol. 86, pp. 154‐60.

4. Aryee, S. and Chen, Z.X. (1999), “Social exchange perspective of employee work attitude and behavior: a comparison of perceived organizational support and leader‐member exchange in China”, paper presented at the National Academy of Management Meetings, Chicago, IL.

5. Aryee, S. and Chen, Z.X. (2000), “Organizational antecedents of leader‐member exchange (LMX) and the mediating role of psychological empowerment in the LMX‐work outcome relationship: an investigation in China”, Paper presented at the National Academy of Management Meetings, Toronto.

Cited by 70 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3