Author:
Moran Nora,Shepherd Steven,Alvarado Janice
Abstract
Purpose
The purpose of this paper is to study how individuals assess responsibility during an uncontrollable event requiring collective action, using crises affecting service workers as contexts. Specifically, the authors examine what parties consumers hold responsible for ensuring service worker welfare following an uncontrollable event and determine what factors make customers more open to accepting responsibility for ensuring worker welfare themselves.
Design/methodology/approach
The authors surveyed a nationally representative sample of US consumers regarding their attitudes toward protecting service workers during COVID-19 and used regression analysis to identify factors that predict attributions of responsibility to customers. The authors also conducted an experiment (using a new crisis context) to determine whether certain key factors impact customer perceptions of their own responsibility for helping employees during an uncontrollable event.
Findings
The survey results show US consumers hold firms most responsible for worker welfare, followed by customers and, finally, government. When examining factors that drive attributions of responsibility for customers, perceptions of how sincere firms are in their efforts to help employees predict higher responsibility attributions, and experimental results confirm that higher perceived firm sincerity increases consumers’ own sense of responsibility toward workers.
Social implications
This research identifies factors that affect consumer support for efforts to help service employees and collective action problems more generally.
Originality/value
This research highlights an under-studied crisis context – uncontrollable events that require collective action – and shows how consumers make assessments about their own responsibility (in addition to the responsibility of the service firm) in these contexts.
Reference66 articles.
1. Passing the buck versus sharing responsibility: the roles of government, firms, and consumers in marketplace risks during COVID-19;Journal of the Association for Consumer Research,2021
2. Culpable control and the psychology of blame;Psychological Bulletin,2000
3. Who is held responsible when disaster strikes? The attribution of responsibility for a natural disaster in an urban election;Journal of Urban Affairs,2006
4. Sweatshops and respect for persons;Business Ethics Quarterly,2003
5. Arora, V.M., Jain, S., Ranney, M.L. and Burstin, L. (2020), “The case for a national universal masking mandate”, Health Affairs, available at: www.healthaffairs.org/do/10.1377/forefront.20200804.515241/full/