Abstract
PurposeThis paper aims to examine whether China's grain price support policy has distorted the grain market price.Design/methodology/approachThe time-varying differences-in-differences (DID) model is used to study the impact of support policies on grain prices, and it is combined with the event study method to explore the dynamic effects of price support policy. Panel data model is used to study the effect of the price support policy on price formation for national grain market prices. In addition, we apply the smooth transformation (STR) model to verify whether there is a distortion in the transmission of grain prices among different markets in China and from the international market to China’s market.FindingsChina’s grain price support policy plays a significant role in rising grain market prices, weakens the decisive role of the market mechanism in the formation of grain prices, hinders the spatial transmission of market price signals and decreases the effect of price transmission from the world market to China’s market.Research limitations/implicationsIn order to ensure both the stability of grain production as well as the market stability, and also to ensure that intervention policies do not distort the food market, the minimum purchase price of grain and market regulation policies should be adjusted as follows: (1) price support policy should be shifted to an income support policy and (2) reasonably determine the scale of reserves and implement a grain minimum purchase price policy in limited areas.Originality/valueOur findings are relevant for understanding the effect of China's grain price support policies on the implementation regions and the price transmission effect, which provide reference experience for developing countries to implement food price policies.
Reference48 articles.
1. Awareness about minimum support price and its impact on diversification decision of farmers in India;Asia and the Pacific Policy Studies,2017
2. The impact of coupled and decoupled government subsidies on off-farm labor participation of US farm operators;American Journal of Agricultural Economics,2006
3. Effectiveness of minimum support price policy for paddy in India with a case study of Punjab;Agricultural Economics Research Review,2012
4. Minimum support price in agriculture: changing requirements;Economic & Political Weekly,2003
5. A quantile autoregression analysis of price volatility in agricultural markets;Agricultural Economics,2020