Abstract
PurposeThis study aims to demonstrate what myths of and about science are reproduced in this popular cultural work (movie – “Oppenheimer”). This is done by examining the unconscious hegemonic positions supported by the reproduction of stereotypical and mythical images of science.Design/methodology/approachContent/Text Analysis: The conceptual analysis of a cultural text – a film (“Oppenheimer”) – through a theoretical apparatus (B. Latour’s theory).FindingsThe film demonstrates its reproduction of three distinct elements. Firstly, it exhibits classic scientistic clichés pertaining to technoscience. Secondly, it highlights the replication of the individualized monomyth about the (super) hero, leading to the exclusion of the intricate conditions of technoscience’s existence. Lastly, the film aligns with the Californian ideology, as proposed by Barbrook.Originality/valueThe value of the text is twofold: (1) To show that the classical approaches of Bruno Latour are still relevant. (2) To show what hidden premises and myths about technoscience are being propagated through a work of pop culture (the film “Oppenheimer”) and, in effect, to show what kind of influence of cultural hegemony is at work here.
Reference46 articles.
1. Altman, S. (2023), “‘I was hoping that the Oppenheimer movie would inspire a generation of kids to be physicists but it really missed the mark on that’, [X (former Twitter)] 22 July”, available at: https://twitter.com/sama/status/1682809958734131200 (accessed 13 January 2024).
2. The Californian ideology;Science as Culture,1996
3. Site-specific: the fractured humanity of J. Robert Oppenheimer;Modern Intellectual History,2008