An improved process model for internal auditing

Author:

Elliott Michael,Dawson Ray,Edwards Janet

Abstract

PurposeTo investigate and understand the reasons why internal auditing is often perceived to not add value. This paper describes the development of a new process model and approach that will improve the actual and perceived value of auditing.Design/methodology/approachProcess analysis, identified areas of potential inefficiency and conflict. The literature review identified the standards and guidance that influence the way internal auditing is managed and its current trends. A questionnaire was sent to auditors and auditees at AWE Plc., to gain their views on audit effectiveness and quantify their perception of value.FindingsQuestionnaire results show variations in the perceived value of internal auditing, particularly of some key stages in the process. The management of internal auditing is too focused on programme achievement, not the resulting value from improvement action.Research limitations/implicationsThe new process model has yet to be tried in practice, and this identifies an area of future research. It is envisaged that some additional audit preparation would be required, and the time taken to conduct an audit may also increase slightly. The financial benefits quoted by applying the new model would be estimated and may require some justification.Practical implicationsThe new model should improve audit effectiveness and its perceived value as the focus changes from simply undertaking an audit, to demonstrating its actual financial value. It has the potential to significantly influence the way both internal and external auditing is conducted in the future.Originality/valueThe improved process model and cost‐benefit audit methodology approach was found to be unique within the scope of the literature review.

Publisher

Emerald

Subject

Accounting,General Economics, Econometrics and Finance,General Business, Management and Accounting

Reference22 articles.

1. Arter, D.R. (1989), Quality Audits for Improved Performance, ASQC Quality Press, Milwaukee, WI.

2. Arter, A.R. (2000), “Management auditing”, Quality Digest, available at: www.qualitydigest.com/april00/html/management (accessed June 2004).

3. Baker, N. (2002), The Value Agenda, available at: Internal Auditing and Business Risk, Institute of Internal Auditing, available at: www.iia.org.uk/knowledgecentre/practicecentre/.cfm (accessed August 2006).

4. Beckmerhagen, I.A., Berg, H.P., Karapetrovic, S.V. and Willborn, W.O. (2004), “On the effectiveness of quality management system audits”, The TQM Magazine, Vol. 16 No. 1, pp. 14‐24.

5. Cangemi, M.P. and Singleton, T. (2003), Managing the Audit Function, Wiley, Hoboken, NJ.

Cited by 25 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3