The impracticality of an international “one size fits all” corporate governance code of best practice

Author:

Davies Marlene,Schlitzer Bernadette

Abstract

PurposeThe purpose of this paper is to review corporate governance literature from an international perspective in terms of having a global code of corporate governance.Design/methodology/approachUsing a wide ranging literature review, the paper looks at the issue of a global corporate governance code of best practice from legal, corporate ownership structure and financial systems perspectives and the consequent/divergence issues that arise.FindingsThe paper supports the hypothesis that the “one size fits all” approach to corporate governance, particularly the Anglo Saxon model, is not necessarily the right approach from a global perspective. Convergence on fundamental features of shareholder protection, independence of directors and establishment of committees may be the preferred way forward.Practical implicationsThe acceptance of a global corporate governance code is limited due to the adaptations in the business environment, investor confidence and corporate successes and failures.Originality/valueThe analysis of the framework provides an interesting paper for corporate governance researchers.

Publisher

Emerald

Subject

Accounting,General Economics, Econometrics and Finance,General Business, Management and Accounting

Reference99 articles.

1. Armstrong, P. (2000), “Corporate governance in commonwealth countries”, in Synge, R. and Borge, J. (Eds), The Commonwealth Trade and Investment Almanac: 2000‐2001, Commonwealth Business Council, London.

2. Arnold, A. (2003), “Sharholder access in Australia”, The Corporate Governance Advisor, Vol. 11 No. 6, pp. 19‐20.

3. Austrian Working Group on Corporate Governance (2002), Austrian Code of Corporate Governance, Austrian Working Group on Corporate Governance, Vienna.

4. Bebchuk, L.A. and Roe, M.J. (1999), “A theory of path dependence in corporate ownership and governance”, Stanford Law Review, Vol. 52 No. 1, pp. 127‐70.

5. Becht, M. and Mayer, C. (2001), “Introduction”, in Barca, F. and Becht, M. (Eds), The Control of Corporate Europe, Oxford University Press, Oxford.

Cited by 34 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3