Auditor recall and evaluation of internal control information: does task‐specific knowledge mitigate part‐list interference?

Author:

Lloyd Bierstaker James

Abstract

Part‐list interference occurs when reading a few items from a previously viewed list interferes with recall of the remaining items. The purpose of this study is to examine if the review of an incomplete flowchart, following the review of a complete narrative, interferes with auditors’ recall and evaluation of internal control information. The potential interaction between auditors’ internal control knowledge and the extent of part‐list interference is also investigated. The results indicate there was a significant interaction between knowledge and part‐list interference, suggesting that interference related to an incomplete flowchart occurred primarily with less knowledgeable auditors. Therefore, higher levels of knowledge may reduce interference when recall cues are organized schematically, as found in flowcharts.

Publisher

Emerald

Subject

Accounting,General Economics, Econometrics and Finance,General Business, Management and Accounting

Reference56 articles.

1. Abdolmohammadi, M.J. (1993), “A comprehensive taxonomy of task complexity and knowledge base demands in auditing”, working paper, Bentley College, Waltham, MA.

2. Alba, J. and Hutchinson, J. (1987), “Dimensions of consumer expertise”, Journal of Consumer Research, pp. 411‐54.

3. Ashton, R. (1990), “Pressure and performance in accounting decision settings: paradoxical effects of incentives, feedback, and justification”, The Accounting Review, Vol. 28, pp. 148‐80.

4. Bedard, J., Biggs, S. and DiPietro, J. (1998), “The effects of hypothesis quality, client management explanations, and industry experience on audit planning decisions”, Advances in Accounting, Vol. 16, pp. 49‐73.

5. Bell, T., Marrs, F., Solomon, I. and Thomas, H. (1997), Auditing Organizations through a Strategic‐Systems Lens, KPMG Peat Marwick LLP, New York, NY.

Cited by 9 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3