Social media sentiment analysis: lexicon versus machine learning

Author:

Dhaoui Chedia,Webster Cynthia M.,Tan Lay Peng

Abstract

Purpose With the soaring volumes of brand-related social media conversations, digital marketers have extensive opportunities to track and analyse consumers’ feelings and opinions about brands, products or services embedded within consumer-generated content (CGC). These “Big Data” opportunities render manual approaches to sentiment analysis impractical and raise the need to develop automated tools to analyse consumer sentiment expressed in text format. This paper aims to evaluate and compare the performance of two prominent approaches to automated sentiment analysis applied to CGC on social media and explores the benefits of combining them. Design/methodology/approach A sample of 850 consumer comments from 83 Facebook brand pages are used to test and compare lexicon-based and machine learning approaches to sentiment analysis, as well as their combination, using the LIWC2015 lexicon and RTextTools machine learning package. Findings Results show the two approaches are similar in accuracy, both achieving higher accuracy when classifying positive sentiment than negative sentiment. However, they differ substantially in their classification ensembles. The combined approach demonstrates significantly improved performance in classifying positive sentiment. Research limitations/implications Further research is required to improve the accuracy of negative sentiment classification. The combined approach needs to be applied to other kinds of CGCs on social media such as tweets. Practical implications The findings inform decision-making around which sentiment analysis approaches (or a combination thereof) is best to analyse CGC on social media. Originality/value This study combines two sentiment analysis approaches and demonstrates significantly improved performance.

Publisher

Emerald

Subject

Marketing,Business and International Management

Reference46 articles.

1. Radicalising the marketing of higher education: learning from student-generated social media data;Journal of Marketing Management,2017

2. Bagging predictors;Machine Learning,1996

3. Computers and QDA - can they help it? A report on a qualitative data analysis programme;The Sociological Review,1990

4. New avenues in opinion mining and sentiment analysis;IEEE Intelligent Systems,2013

5. ‘We (don’t) know how you feel’ - a comparative study of automated vs manual analysis of social media conversations;Journal of Marketing Management,2015

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3